Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Suresh Enterprises Versus CCE. Madurai

2016 (11) TMI 856 - CESTAT CHENNAI

SSI exemption - use of brand name of others - reliance placed on the decision of the case of Kali Aerated Water Works Vs. CCE, Madurai [2015 (6) TMI 226 - SUPREME COURT] where it was held that appellant has been using its own brand name 'Kalimark' an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d order was passed in the year 2004 and the Apex Court judgement came up on 13.05.2015. In between, 11 years have been passed and the right title and ownership of the trade mark has been settled by the Apex Court - The authority is directed to issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ass order within one month from the late date of hearing of the matter - appeal allowed by way of remand. - Appeal No. E/212/2005 - FINAL ORDER No. 41577/2016 - Dated:- 19-9-2016 - Shri D.N. PANDA, Judicial Member And Shri MADHU MOHAN DAMODHAR, Techn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder Notification No. 1/93-CE dated 01.03.1993, No. 59/1994-CE dated 01.03.1994 and 8/2001-CE dated 01.03.2001 is not admissible to it placing judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kali Aerated Water Works Vs. CCE, Madurai - 2015 (320) ELT 692 ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his three sons viz., Mr. K.P.Rajendran, Mr. K.P.Dharmarajan, Mr. K.P.Ganesan and a daughter Mrs. S. Manimozhi, were part of the family business being members of the HUF. Later, they all entered into a family settlement in terms of a Deed of Mutual Ag .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

para-8 of the adjudication order throws light that Hon ble High Court of Madras in Writ appeals No. 1570 - 1576, 1578/1994, made an interim direction that appellant has to deposit 50% of the current excise duty demand as well as to furnish security f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version