Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT-5 (1) , Mumbai and DCIT-5 (1) , Mumbai

Disallowance u/s 14A - Held that:- The assessee’s case is covered by sub-sections (2) & (3) of section 14A as the assessee is claiming that no expenditure has been incurred by it in relation to the exempt income. We have seen that as per the balance sheet , investment reflected in as on 31.03.2010 was of ₹ 29,98,21,124/-. Further, as per the balance sheet for AY 2009-10, the total investment of the assessee as on 31.03.2010 was ₹ 29,98,21,124/- and the assessee was having reserve and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s with AO. The disallowance made by AO and sustained by ld CIT(A) is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed u/s 14A r.w.s. Rule 8D. There is no finding that assessee has sufficient fund available with him or not. Hence, we deem it appropriate to restore this ground of appeal to the file of AO to pass order afresh. - Disallowance of Software Usages Charges - revenue v/s capital expenditure - Held that:- For ascertaining as to whether the expenditure of computer software gives enduri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

incurred on up-gradation of software do not result into acquisition of any asset nor acquisition of enduring benefits as software become obsolete very quickly. - I.T.A. No. 1778/Mum/2013, I.T.A. No. 5150/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 30-9-2016 - SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, AM AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM For The Appellant : Shri Feroze Andhyarujina -AR For The Respondent : Shri Nitin Waghmode (DR) ORDER Per Pawan Singh, JM: 1. These two appeals are filed by assessee against the order of CIT(Appeals) -9, Mumbai dated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rn of income for relevant Assessment Year (AY) on 22.09.2009 declaring total income of Rs. NIL. The return of income came under scrutiny. The assessment under u/s 143( 3) was framed vide order dated 13.02.2011. While framing the assessment, the AO made the disallowance u/s. 14A of ₹ 19,43,486/-. The assessee claimed Software uses Charges of ₹ 14,56,292/-. The AO hold that the payments were made on account of software development which is capital in nature. Thus, depreciation @ 60% wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. 14A. The assessee claimed Software Uses charges of ₹ 13,83,762/-. The AO allowed depreciation @ 60% and ₹ 5,53,505/- was disallowed in the assessment order. The assessee carried that matter in appeal before the First Appellate Authority (FAA), wherein both the disallowance was confirmed. Hence, the present appeal is filed before us. 3. We have heard Ld AR of the assessee and Ld DR for the Revenue and perused the material available on record. The ld AR of the assessee argued that p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elation to earning of exempt income. The Ld. AR of the assessee further relied upon the decision of Rajshree Production Pvt. Ltd. (TS-570 ITAT 2013, Mum), Kalyan Steel Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITA No. 1733/PN/2011), CIT vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. (2013) 85 CCH 226 (GUJHC), Shopper Stop Ltd. vs. ACIT, ACIT vs. Midcaps Ltd. decision of Indore Tribunal. On the other hand, Ld. DR for the Revenue strongly supported the order of authorities below. 4. We have considered the rival contenti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lated the disallowance of ₹ 19,43,486/-. Before the First Appellate Authority (FAA), the assessee submitted that the entire investment have been made out of assessee s own fund as far as interest of ₹ 3,92,930/- which was paid to Karnataka Bank Ltd. on term loan of ₹ 500 Lakhs, taken from it on 30th May 2008, on the same date it was utilized by advancing loan to M/s harmony Investments & Properties of interest which is shown as income in P&L account, hence, this interes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment in share without a part going to the business. It was further concluded that it is not possible that entire income would have been invested in share and debentures and share application money specially when the assessee not categorized as to how such sum had been invested in business. The assessee s case is covered by sub-sections (2) & (3) of section 14A of the Act as the assessee is claiming that no expenditure has been incurred by it in relation to the exempt income. We have seen tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the nature of investment as if it was strategic or the investment were made in earlier years and the manner in which exempt income was derived and credited to the account of assessee. Similarly no such exercise was made by Ld. CIT(A). The power of ld CIT(A) is co-terminus with AO. The disallowance made by AO and sustained by ld CIT(A) is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed u/s 14A r.w.s. Rule 8D. There is no finding that assessee has sufficient fund available with him or not. Hence, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Software Usages Charges. The Ld. AR of the assessee argued that Software Uses Charges are Revenue in nature. The Software Uses Charges are not enduring in nature and they are fully allowable and relied upon the decision of Thomas Cook (I) Ltd. vs. DCIT, ITAT, Mumbai in ITA No. 9353 & 9354/Mum/1992 reported in 15 SOT 392. The Ld. DR for Revenue supported the orders of authorities below. 6. We have considered the rival contention of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version