Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sewasons Enterprises Ltd. Versus Income-Tax Officer

2016 (11) TMI 1033 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Disallowance of trip expenditure - quantification of expenses - Held that:- Quantification of disallowance does not involve any question of law. It is dependent upon the facts and circumstances in a particular year. The Revenue authorities have quantified the disallowance at ₹ 3,48,870 on an analysis of the details of the expenditure produced by the assessee. Once an estimated opinion is being taken by an authority, then, that opinion ought not to be intervened by the higher appellate auth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

High Court] disallowance was made out of the telephone expenditure under the belief that such facility might have been used by the employees of the company for personal purpose. Here in the present case, the learned Assessing Officer has brought on record that no business visit was required to be undertaken at Goa, and therefore, the expenditure cannot be debited in the accounts of the assessee. - Decided against assessee - I. T. A. No. 1148/Ahd/2013 - Dated:- 1-8-2016 - Rajpal Yadav (Judicial M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ature. In brief, the grievance of the assessee is that the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in rejecting the books of account and disallowance of ₹ 3,48,870 out of trip expenditure and ₹ 48,858 out of travelling expenditure. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee-company at the relevant time was engaged in transportation business. It has filed its return of income electronically on September 12, 2009 de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng to the Assessing Officer, in terms of percentage, discrepancy comes to 8.85 per cent. over the total such expenditure. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer has disallowed a sum of ₹ 17,39,100. 4. On appeal, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has observed that as far as purchase of diesel is concerned, there could not be any inflation and the evidence is being maintained by the assessee. Therefore, out of the diesel expenditure, disallowance made by the Assessing Officer has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee had debited a sum of ₹ 1,84,103 under the head travelling expenses. On verification of record, the learned Assessing Officer found a sum of ₹ 48,858 was debited by the assessee with regard to Goa trip, which was undertaken in July, 2008. The assessee could not produce any supporting evidence. Moreover, the assessee has no business connection with Goa. The learned Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of the assessee to this extent. On appeal, the learned Commissioner of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessment year 2007-08, the trip and diesel expenditure was ₹ 1,25,09,666 and the Tribunal has confirmed the addition of ₹ 1,00,000. With regard to the disallowance of ₹ 48,858 is concerned, on the strength of the hon'ble Gujarat High Court decision in the case of Sayaji Iron and Engg. Co. v. CIT [2002] 253 ITR 749 (Guj), he contended that there cannot be any personal element in any of the expenditure incurred by a company, and therefore, no disallowance could be made. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Explanation I to section 37, then, such amount cannot be claimed as deduction. Thus, this plea of the assessee cannot be entertained. With regard to second disallowance, he contended that the expenditure was not incurred for the purpose of business. 8. I have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. As far as rejection of the books of account is concerned, this aspect has not been seriously disputed by the assessee before me. More so, the Assessing Officer poi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue, and thereafter observed that out of trip expenditure, the addition is to be made to the extent of 10 per cent. On due consideration of the material on record, including the arguments of the assessee that in earlier assessment year, a lump sum disallowance at ₹ 1,00,000 was confirmed by the Tribunal, I am of the view that quantification of disallowance does not involve any question of law. It is dependent upon the facts and circumstances in a particular year. The Revenue authorities hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version