Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ms. Rakhi Sawant, M/s Chandravijay Shah and Co., Chartered Accountant Versus Income Tax Officer 11 (1) (3) , Mumbai

Revision u/s 263 - provisions of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) application - Held that:- We find that in the impugned order, the ld.CIT(A) has not discussed about the non applicability of the provisions of section 194C and or 194J and has straightway applied the provisions of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Even regarding the genuineness/requirement of the payments for assessee’s profession, the order of ld.CIT(A) is not a speaking one. In our view, the entire matter is required to be looked into afresh by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tistical purposes. - I.T.A. No.2965 & 2966/Mum/2013 - Dated:- 28-9-2016 - SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : None For The Respondent : Shri A K Srivastava ORDER Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The above captioned appeals have been preferred by the assessee have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order, for the sake of convenience. 2. First, we take up assessee s appeal bearing ITA No.2966/Mum/2013. ITA No.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch did not function.The case then posted on 11.11.2014 and then for 16.2.2015. However, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and it was ordered to issue notice to the assessee by a registered post. The case was fixed for hearing on 18.3.2015 again on 18.3.2015 no one appeared on behalf of the assessee and the case was adjourned to 2.7.2015. Thereafter the case was fixed for 29.10.2015 on which date the counsel for the assessee appeared and requested for adjournment vide letter dated 26.10.201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee and the case was fixed for hearing on 27.6.2016. It was also directed to issue notice by RPAD and also through telephone to the assessee s counsel to inform about the next date of hearing. The Registry accordingly issued notice by RPAD and a noting has been made in the order-sheet that the counsel of the assessee was informed on telephone about the next date of hearing. However, on the next date of hearing i.e. 26.6.2016, the matter could not be heard for want of time and both the parti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e it. It is not the duty of this Tribunal to issue notice each and every time to the assessee to come and appear in her own appeals, when the next date of hearing is duly informed in open court or through Notice Board whenever the Bench did not function. However, a perusal of the above sequence of dates of hearing reveals that the assessee/her representative have always been reluctant to attend the case and all the time they have to be called upon either by notice through RPAD and even through t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

It has further been pleaded that her Chartered Accountant Shri Rajesh Saluja who had represented her case in the proceedings before the lower authorities did not co-operate with her in handling the appeal before this Tribunal. That she thereafter collected all the relevant papers and handed over to new representative. Her new representative after getting the entire papers has filed the present appeal. 5. The ld. DR, on the other hand, has relied upon the following case laws and has pleaded that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Even though earlier Chartered Accountant did not co-operate with her, yet, she required to file appeal in a reasonable time. The delay of few days for non co-operation of the Authorized Representative/CA can be understood, but it has not been explained as to what prevented the assessee to engage another representative for a period of above two years. Even the explanation tendered by the assessee is general and vague. The assessee has failed to explain any justifiable reasons for the delay of 704 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d under section 143(3) read with section 263 of the Act. The assessee in this appeal has taken the following grounds : 1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 3, Mumbai ("CIT(A) erroneously confirmed the Addition of ₹ 8,00,000 paid by the Appellant to Super Cassettes Industries Limited towards the Video Production Charges without verifying and enquiring whether, in view of the Explanation (i)(l) to section 194C or 2nd Proviso to section 194J of the Act or otherwise, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rds the Video Production Charges and so is the case with CJT(A), leading to conclude that none of the TDS Provisions, either section 194C or section 194J, were applicable to the said Payment. In the absence of clarity about which specific TDS Provision applies to a Transaction, the Addition is uncalled for and invalid ab initio. 3. The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the Appellant is a Professional and was consistently following Cash Accounting System and erroneously confirmed the Addit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any had all the rights, including selection of Director of the said Video Album as stated in its Letter dated 16.07.2005 and the Appellant had no choice of selection in the matter whatsoever. 5. The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the Appellant has established the veracity of Payment of ₹ 8,00,000 to Super Cassettes Industries Limited towards the Video Production Charges by producing all relevant supporting Documents. 6. Since the Revision Order is based on surmises, suspicion and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e from the beginning has been reluctant regularly in attending the proceedings before this Tribunal, in view of our reasons recorded above while deciding the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.2899/M/2013, we proceed to decide this appeal also ex-parte of the assessee after hearing the ld. DR. 10. As revealed from the above grounds of appeal, the only issue raised by the assessee through the grounds of appeal is relating to confirmation of addition of ₹ 8,00,000/- paid by the assessee t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version