GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2010 (8) TMI 1064 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

2010 (8) TMI 1064 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT - TMI - W.P. (Cr.) No. 325 of 2010 - Dated:- 6-8-2010 - THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE For the Petitioner: M/s Biren Poddar, Darshan Poddar, Deepak Sinha and Piyush Poddar For the Respondent: M/s Amit Kumar Das, Charanjeet Mukherjee ORDER 1. I have heard all parties at length. The petitioner is being prosecuted under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter called "the Act"). 2. This writ petition has been filed alleging .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere not mentioned in the Schedule of the Act. 3. All these offences were inserted in the Schedule by the amending Act of the year 2009 with effect from 1.6.2009. For appreciating the argument it is necessary to quote Section 3, section 2 (u) and 2 (v) of the Act : "3. Offence of money-laundering.- Whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime and projec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dencing title to, or interest in, such property or assets, wherever located." 4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner it is the date when the "proceeds of crime" were acquired/generated which is the relevant date. The argument proceeds further to say that the word "Crime" is in Section 3 means the offences listed in the Schedule. Section 2 (u) of the Act, which defines the phrase "proceeds of crime", has been pressed into service for the above in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the scheduled crimes and, therefore, it would be the date of "laundering" which would be relevant. The "laundering" as used in Section 3 comprises of involvement in any process or activity by which the illicit money is being projected as untainted. 7. Thus, the relevant date is not the date of acquisition of illicit money but the dates on which such money is being processed for projecting it untainted. 8. At this stage we are concerned with the allegations, and not with the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version