Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 1124 - ITAT MUMBAI

2016 (11) TMI 1124 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Late filing fee u/s. 234E while passing intimation u/s. 200A - intimation u/s. 200A has been processed prior to 1.6.2015 - Held that:- Assessing Officer has exceeded his jurisdiction in levying fee under Section 234E while processing the statement and make adjustment under Section 200A of the Act. Therefore, the impugned intimation of the lower authorities levying fee under Section 234E of the Act cannot be sustained in law. However, it is made clear that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri Shekhar Gupta For The Revenue : Shri N. Sathya Moorthy ORDER PER C.N. PRASAD, JM: These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-59, Mumbai dated 22.04.2015 pertaining to assessment year 2013-14 & 2014-15. 2. The only grievance of the assessee in both these appeals is that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the order of the Assessing Officer in charging late filing fee u/s. 234E of the Act while passing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e u/s. 234E in respect of quarterly statements of TDS in Form No. 26Q. 5. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). However, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee holding that the issue is covered by the decision of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia Vs Union of India dated 9.2.2015. 6. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee before us referring to Section 200A of the Act submits that clauses (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A were su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Chennai Bench in the case of Smt. G. Indhirani Vs DCIT (172 TTJ 239) and the decision of Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare (P) Ltd Vs DCIT (TDS) ( 63 Taxman.com 333). 7. The Ld. Departmental Representative supports the orders of the authorities below. 8. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below and the decisions relied on. We find that a similar issue has arisen in a bunch of appeals namely M/s. Kash Realtors Pvt. Ltd & Others in ITA Nos. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in intimation under section 200A of the Act. 2. In some of the appeals there is a representation by the Ld. Counsel/authorized representative on behalf of the assessee. However, in some of appeals, none has come present and adjournment has been sought. However, considering the short and common issue involved in all the appeals which can be adjudicated on the basis of only a few material facts, we proceed to decide the appeals rejecting the adjournment applications, if any, moved in any of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w.e.f. 1.6.2015. 4. Now coming to the facts of these cases, in the course of the processing of the TDS returns, the Assessing Officer (TDS) [hereinafter referred to as the AO(TDS)] raised demand in each of the above cases by way of an intimation issued under section 200A of the Act for levy of fees under section 234E for delay in filing of TDS statement beyond the period stipulated as per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act. Aggrieved by this levy of fees, the respective assessees carrie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(ASR) 0145 wherein the Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal has held that since the intimation under section 200A is an appealable order before the Ld. CIT(A) (w.e.f. 1.7.2012) under section 246A(a) and therefore the Ld. CIT(A) could have examined the validity of the adjustments made under the intimation under section 200A in the light and scope of the provisions of section 200A. The Tribunal further observed that since there was no enabling provision under section 200A before 01.06.15 providing for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

TDS statements under section 200A for the period prior to 1.6.2015, was not legally valid. It has therefore been contended on behalf of the assessees that the TDS statements filed by the assessee has to be processed in the manner as laid down in the provisions of section 200A as in force during the relevant period. That the levy of fees under section 234E of the Act, thus, cannot be a subject matter of process, while processing the statement under section 200A of the Act so far as the period pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO (TDS) has otherwise jurisdiction to levy penalty for delay in filing TDS statements as provided under section 200(3) of the Act. It has therefore been contended that the AO(TDS) has rightly exercised his jurisdiction while making adjustment of the fees leviable under section 234E for non compliance/delay in filing the TDS statements as provided under section 200(3) of the Act. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and have also gone through the case laws cited before us. So far as the relia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has neither been raised before the Hon ble Bombay High Court nor has been adjudicated. Hence, the reliance of the Revenue on the decision of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia vs. Union of India (supra) so far as the issue is concerned, is of no help to the Revenue. One of the contentions raised before the Hon ble Bombay High Court was that under the provisions of the Act, no appeal is provided for or from an arbitrary order passed under section 234E of the Act. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ever, in the cases before us, the grievance of the assessees is not against the levy of fees under section 234E of the Act independently rather, the issue is that while processing the TDS statements under section 200A of the Act, whether or not, the fees leviable under section 234E can be adjusted therein? No doubt, the order passed under section 200A is an appealable order before the Ld. CIT(A) under section 246 of the Act (w.e.f. 1.7.2012). The appellate order of the Ld. CIT(A) passed under 25 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (supra) has held that in the absence of enabling provision under section 200A prior to 01.06.15 such a power was not vested with the AO (TDS). The said decision has been further followed by the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal in a recent decision dated 05.02.16 in the case of Varun Radiators Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT (CPC- TDS) 2016-TIOL-436-ITAT-AHM. However, we have come across another decision of the Chennai Bench dated 10.07.15 in the case of Smt. G. Indhirani & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i Bench of the Tribunal has also examined the other contention of the Revenue that section 234E is an independent section and the fees can be levied by the AO (TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section 200(3) of the Act. The Tribunal, considering the above submissions, held that if the assessee fails to pay the fees before filing the statement under section 200(3) of the Act, the Assessing Authority may pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced as under: 4. The Ld. counsel invited our attention to Section 234A of the Act and submitted that when an assessee fails to deliver the statement within the prescribed time, the assessee is liable to pay by way of fee a sum of Z200/- for every day during such a period the failure continues. Referring to the word used in the section 234E "he shall be liable to pay", th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

presentative, submitted that Section 234E of the Act provides for payment of fee, if the assessee fails to deliver the statement as prescribed in Section 200(3) of the Act. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has every authority to levy fee either by a separate order or while processing the statement under Section 200A of the Act. 6. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material on record. Section 200A of the Act provides for processing of the statement o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d after making the following adjustments, namely :- (i) any arithmetical error in the statement ; or (ii) an incorrect claim, apparent from an information in the statement (b) the interest, if any, shall be computed on the basis of the sums deductible as computed in the statement ; (c) the sum payable by, or the amount of refund due to, the deductor shall be determined after adjustment of amount computed under clause (b) against any amount paid under section 200 and section 201, and any amount p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent is filed. Explanation -For the purposes of this sub-section, "art incorrect claim apparent from any information in the statement" shall mean a claim, on the basis of an entry, in the statement- (i) of an item, which is inconsistent with another entry of the same or some other item in such statement (ii) in respect of rate of deduction of tax at source, where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purposes of processing of statements under subsec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of convenience, we are reproducing the amendment made in Section 200A by the Finance Act, 2015 as under:- "In section 200A of the Income-tax Act, in sub-section (1), for clauses (c) to (e), the following clauses shall be substituted with effect from the 1st day of June, 2015, namely:- "(c) the fee, if any, shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 234E; (d) the sum payable by, or the amount of refund due to, the deductor shal l be determined af ter adjustment of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot; Therefore, it is obvious that prior to 01.06.2015, there was no enabling provision in Section 200A of the Act for making adjustment in respect of the statement filed by the assessee with regard to tax deducted at source by levying fee under Section 234E of the Act. The Parliament for the first time enabled the Assessing Officer to make adjustment by levying fee under Section 234E of the Act with effect from 01.06.2015. Therefore, as rightly submitted by the Ld. counsel for the assessees, whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deducted at source is beyond the scope of adjustment provided under Section 200A of the Act. Therefore, such adjustment cannot stand in the eye of law. 8. The next contention of the assessee is that Section 234E of the Act says that the assessee "shall be liable to pay" by way of fee, therefore, the assessee has to voluntarily pay the fee and the Assessing Officer has no authority to levy fee. The argument of the Ld.counsel for the assessee is very attractive and fanciful. However, we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 200A of the Act by making adjustment after 01 .06.2015. However, prior to 01 .06.2015, the Assessing Officer had every authority to pass an order separately levying fee under Section 234E of the Act. What is not permissible is that levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act while processing the statement of tax deducted at source and making adjustment before 01 .06.2015. It does not mean that the Assessing Officer cannot pass a separate order under Section 234E of the Act levying fee for th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

"396. Dacoi ty wi th murder - I f any one of f ive or more persons, who are conjointly committing dacoity, commits murder in so committing dacoity, every one of those persons shal l be punished wi th death, or imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Similarly, Section 408 of Indian Penal Code provides for criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant. In addition to imprisonment which may extend to se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, shall also levy fine. If the contention of the Ld.counsel for the assessees is accepted, then the Magistrate or Sessions Judge, as the case may be, who is trying the accused for the offence punishable under Indian Pencal Code, may not have authority to levy fine. 10. It is well known principle that the fine prescribed under the Indian Penal Code has to be levied by the concerned Magistrate or Sessions Judge who is trying the offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code. Therefore, the conten .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act. However, if the assessee fails to pay the fee before filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act, the assessing authority is well within his limit in passing a separate order levying such a fee in addition to processing the statement under Section 200A of the Act. In other words, before 01.06.2015, the assessing authority could pass a separate order under Section 234E levying fee for delay in filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version