Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Sky Gourmet Air Catering Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE New Delhi

Levy of duty - Manufacture - complete food tray as served to the passengers on board the aircraft - Held that: - the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Bench in the case of Taj Sats Air Catering Ltd. Vs. CCE, Delhi-II [2016 (3)777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] where it was held that Out of Food preparations as contained in the food tray served to the passengers on board, admittedly, the appellants did prepare dal, roti, rice, curry etc. and supplied the same in trays and bowls covered with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not leviable - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Appeal No. E/2580/2011-EX (DB) - Final Order No. 54946/2016 - Dated:- 8-11-2016 - Dr. Satish Chandra, President And Mr. Ashok K. Arya, Member (Technical) Shri R.S. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant Shri R.K. Manjhi, D.R. for the respondent ORDER Per Justice Dr. Satish Chandra Shri R.S. Gupta, ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the assessee appellant is an Air caterer and engaged in the manufacture of food preparation such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmed the demand of excise duty on all items in the tray as branded food preparation on the ground that the tray had a logo placed in a slip inside cutlery pouch. The ld. Counsel submits that the demand is time-barred. 3. On the other hand, Shri R.K. Manjhi, ld. Counsel for the department reiterates the order of the lower authorities. 4. After hearing both the sides and perused the record, it appears that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Bench in the case of Taj Sats Air Cate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r by the airline staff and served to the passengers. In any case since the Department has not established the sustainability of the demand on the ground of manufacture, this aspect on brand name is not further examined by us. 14. The appellant s strongly contested the demand on the ground of time bar. We find that the demand-cum-Show Cause Notice was issued on 23.02.2010 for the period covering 01.02.2005 to 03.05.2006. It is seen that the notice has been issued after many years invoking extende .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version