Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 1219 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2016 (11) TMI 1219 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI - Option to pay reduced penalty - job-worker to M/s. Parle Products Private Ltd. - assesee cannot be treated as own unit of M/s Parle Products Pvt. Ltd., for distribution of input service tax credits - period from 01.08.2005 to June, 2011 - time bar - whether the Commissioner (Appeals) has powers to give the benefit of 25% reduced penalty? - Held that: - the department has clarified that the benefit of reduced penalty would be available only at the sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing Authority levied an incorrect penalty without giving an option to pay reduced penalty, the assessee was left with no choice but to challenge the penalty which he would otherwise have to pay, which is statutorily not actually leviable. Since statutory authorities have themselves acted illegally and contrary to first proviso to Section 11AC ibid, the assessee cannot be faulted for challenging the order. - Moreover in the present case, the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the demand whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iving option to pay reduced penalty - appeal dismissed - decided against Department. - Appeal No.E/327336/2013 - FINAL ORDER No.A/31016/2016 - Dated:- 25-10-2016 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S. Member(Judicial) Sh. P.S. Reddy Assistant Registrar (AR) for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. [Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] The above appeal is filed by department against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) who gave the respondent the option to pay reduced penalty. 2. The respondents are e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Products Pvt. Ltd., for distribution of input service tax credits. The Show Cause Notice was issued demanding wrongly availed credit on the period from 01.08.2005 to June, 2011, amounting to ₹ 14,49,469/along with interest and also proposing penalties. 3. After adjudication, the Original Authority confirmed the demand along with interest and imposed equal penalty. Being aggrieved the assessee filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) vide the order impugned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pay reduced penalty of 25% of duty which is erroneous. He relied upon the Circular No.898/18/2009-CX., dated 15.09.2009. He submitted that when the assessee files an appeal challenging the penalty imposed without availing option 25% reduced penalty prescribed by law, then the assessee would loose the option. That no further option can be given at appellant stage. 5. None appeared on behalf of the respondent. The matter was taken for disposal after hearing the department and by perusal of record .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version