Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Intelligence Office, The State of Kerala Versus K. Mari

Jurisdiction of Single Judge Bench to reduce quantum of penalty - tax evasion - whether respondent was able to establish that his conduct was not fraudulent and that his omissions are not so grave so as to attract the maximum penalty, then it would be permissible - Held that: - The fact that the learned single Judge has only reduced the penalty and did not exonerate the respondent from it completely, makes us to conclude that the learned single Judge found the respondent to have acted in culpabi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see that the case of the respondent that he brought the vehicle to Kerala for executing a work under a contract/agreement with Mr.Kumar appears to be probable. However, his conduct in creating a document, in support of his contention, on a stamp paper that was purchased subsequent to the interception would not give the benefit of exculpation. In such view of the matter, it is, therefore, necessary that he be mulcted with penalty, since he was only enjoying the benefit of doubt based on attendan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

: Sri. Mohammed Rafiq For the Respondent : Sri Harisankar V. Menon Smt. Meera V. Menon JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J. This appeal has been filed by the Intelligence Officer and State of Kerala assailing the judgment of the learned single Judge, wherein the order of penalty initially imposed by the Tax Authorities at an amount of ₹ 7,08,470/- was modified and reduced by the learned single Judge to an amount of ₹ 1,00,000/-. 2. The appellants challenge the judgment on various grounds .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the respondent. 5. The issue as to whether in all cases where evasion of tax has been established the maximum penalty stipulated under the Statute has to be imposed is a matter that has been considered by this Court in various judgments settled position is, as we will presently state, that the power to impose penalty being quasi judicial in its effect and ambit, will, therefore, have to be exercised with great circumspection and that the quantum of penalty imposed should depend upon the gravi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alty); it is a contumacious or fraudulent or other blame-worthy or objectionable conduct of an assessee in fulfilling his obligations mentioned in section 45A(1) of the Act that will attract the levy of penalty. We have no doubt in our mind that mens rea or the mental element is embedded in the crucial word 'evaded' or 'sought to be evaded' occurring in section 45A(1) of the Act." Even though the referred judgment do not deal with the issue as to whether the maximum penalty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity to apply its mind to all relevant aspects of the default alleged to have been committed by a dealer. Their Lordships stated the law that the order levying penalty is quasi judicial in character and that it involves exercise of judicial discretion. It was further observed that levy of penalty is not compulsive, but only enabling or permissive. 7. The unequivocal declaration of law on this issue is stated in paragraph 7 of the judgment in Gentle Joseph & Co. (supra), which is extracted as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nter to show that the officer has not exercised the judicial discretion vested in him according to law. In other words, there should be independent evaluation and appraisal and the grounds should be disclosed before the maximum penalty is levied. Before imposing penalty under section 29A(4) of the Act the officer has, therefore, to find that there has been an attempt to evade the tax. Such finding can be rendered only on the basis of materials and the reasons for such finding should also be disc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cient mitigating circumstances favouring the assessee, which would then warrant reduction of penalty that has been imposed to a much lower one. We are essentially called upon by the appellants to answer whether such a course of action was available to the learned single Judge. We will examine that in the event there are sufficient reasons to show that the Assessing Officer and the other authorities had not considered the relevant materials and have not considered all the issues that are imperati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction, to impose penalty. Section 47(6) reads as under: "The officer authorised under sub-section (5) shall, before conducting the inquiry, serve notice on the owner of the goods and give him an opportunity of being heard and if, after the enquiry, such officer finds that there has been an attempt to evade the tax due under this Act, he shall, by order, impose on the owner of the goods a penalty not exceeding twice the amount of tax attempted to be evaded, as may be estimated by such office .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nimum quantum of penalty to be imposed but only mandates that the penalty so imposed would not exceed twice the amount of tax. It is, therefore, axiomatic that the Officers concerned are under a statutory obligation to exercise the discretion vested with them under the Statute in a manner that would answer the tests of fairness and appropriateness based on the culpability of the assessee as has been determined by due process. The binding caution advised in Gentle Joseph & Co. (supra) should .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Reg.No.TN-29/A 4161 in the name of the respondent was intercepted by the Intelligence Squad, headed by the Intelligence Inspector, Squad No.V, Commercial Taxes, Palakkad on 01.07.2013 at Eruthanpatty at about 6.30 A.M. on the allegation that the vehicle did not have the requisite documents under Section 46 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (referred to as 'the Act' for brevity). A notice under Section 17A of the Act was issued to the driver of the vehicle demanding a security deposit of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

470/-, being double the amount of tax that is alleged to be evaded under Section 47(6) of the Act. The respondent carried this order in appeal before the Assistant Commissioner (Appeals), Palakkad, who confirmed the order and dismissed the appeal. The respondent, thereafter, filed a further appeal before the Kerala Value Added Tax Additional Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' for brevity), Palakkad, which, on elaborate consideration of all the issues, allowed the appeal and set aside the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was brought to Kerala not for sale or transfer, imposition of penalty was not legally sustainable. 14. The State, therefore, filed O.T.Rev.No.25/2014, which was allowed by a Bench of this Court setting aside the order of the Tribunal and remanding the matter back to the Intelligence Officer enabling the respondent herein to adduce evidence to establish that he had brought the vehicle to Kerala based on an agreement with Mr.Kumar for the purpose of executing the laterite quarrying work. Conseque .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eologist, Mining and Geology Department, Manjeri. He then claimed that he had entered into an agreement dated 25.06.2013 with Mr.Kumar for undertaking the work of excavation. He has also produced copies of the permit and agreement before the Intelligence Officer. It appears that the Intelligence Officer summoned Mr.Kumar also and a statement was obtained by him from Mr.Kumar along with that of the respondent herein. These statements are produced in the writ petition as Exhibits P5 and P5(a) resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the learned single Judge on 22.06.2016. 16. It appears that in the writ petition the State had taken a contention that the conduct of the respondent in filing a writ petition without invoking and seeking the effective and efficacious alternative remedy available under the Statute shall not be countenanced. The State also contended that the penalty was imposed without valid reasons and that it requires further modification. 17. The learned single Judge, however, proceeded to hear and dispose .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r issuing interim orders, it would not be appropriate, procedurally and legally, to relegate the petitioner to the alternative remedies. We find no infirmity in the findings of the learned single Judge in this regard. 18. As regards imposition of penalty and its quantum, we see from the impugned judgment that the learned single Judge had considered all the relevant aspects and had, for specific reasons, thought it fit to reduce the penalty. It is true that the appellants have contended through o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

purpose of travel from Tamil Nadu to Malappuram, the Intercepting Officer and the competent authority under Section 47(6) came to the conclusion that the respondent was using the normal less preferred bye-route with the deliberate intention to evade tax. The appellants, therefore, contend that in view of sub clause (9) of Section 6 and Section 46 of the Act, a presumption runs in favour of the Revenue that the respondent was trying to evade tax. 19. Though we find considerable force in the conte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d any intention to effect sale of the vehicle in Kerala and avoid tax. Further, even at the time of interception, the driver of the vehicle intimated the Intercepting Officer that it was being taken to Malappuram for a work of excavating laterite soil. It is true that the vehicle did not have any documents in support of this claim. However, this obvious lacuna was sought to be explained by the respondent by trying to establish that there was indeed a contract for excavating laterite soil using t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gainst the proceedings and that the same would not give rise to the evidence to the claim of the respondent. However, various other attendant circumstances, namely, the quarrying permit dated 17.12.2012 favouring Mr.Kumar and the fact that the vehicle was absolutely brand new, would mitigate the suspicion to a large extent. It is true that the agreement has been entered into in a stamp paper that was purchased after the interception. Further, the learned single Judge took the view that even thou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y not in approval of the conduct of the respondent in attempting to create documents in this manner, but we are in approval of the opinion of the learned single Judge that this has been done by the respondent only to establish that he had an agreement ante with Mr.Kumar and that the excavator was transported to Kerala only for the purpose of executing the said work. 20. A reading of Section 47(6) ineluctably leads to a conclusion that imposition of penalty can be based only on the establishment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d against the respondent were not considered in its proper perspective and it is, therefore, that the learned single Judge, on a proper examination of all the attendant and related circumstances, decided to reduce the penalty substantially to ₹ 1,00,000/-. The learned single Judge also took note of the fact that the vehicle had been in the custody of the authorities for over three years, and he, therefore, reduced the penalty so as to enable the writ petitioner/respondent to take delivery .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version