Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Customs, C. Ex., and Service Tax Versus Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories

Rebate claim - jurisdiction under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act - recovery of erroneously sanctioned refund claim - Held that: - The impugned recovery order passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad – IV confirming the recovery of erroneously sanctioned rebate was only a consequential order of recovery based on the orders which were challenged before the Delhi High Court. When the Delhi High Court set aside the consequential demands raised for recovery of the rebat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gal. Even otherwise, if consequential recovery is permitted, on any ground, it amounts to reviewing the order of Delhi High Court. When the order of Delhi High Court attained finality, this Court while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act, has no option except to confirm the order under challenge. - On an overall consideration of the entire material available on record, we find no ground to set aside the order passed by the CESTAT, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

JJ. Shri Gunaranjan Advocate, for the Respondent. Shri Manmadha Rao, SSC, for the Petitioner. ORDER (Per Hon ble Sri Justice M.Satyanarayana Murthy) The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad - IV Commissionerate preferred this appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, aggrieved by the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore in Final Order No.21039/2015, dated 28.04.2015 in Appeal No. E/25509/201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00s pack) made under DEPB scheme and for ₹ 1,75,57,537/- on export of P or P Medicaments. The said claims were received in the Divisional Office on 18.07.2011 and 21.11.2011 respectively. The goods manufactured by the assessee were cleared for export to M/s Dr.Reddy s Laboratories Inc, 200, Somerset Corporate BLVD, Floor 7, Birdgewater, New Jersey, USA, their subsidiary unit for a value of ₹ 411,33,22,668/- and ₹ 34,09,23,058/- on payment of duty of ₹ 21,18,36,117/- and & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 3,13,95,000/- per lakh numbers of OLANZAPINE 20mg USP Tablets of 30s/100s/5002 pack; b) the reasons put forth by the assessee for such huge variation in cost price and sale price of OLANZAPINE 20 mg USP Tablets exported are that the product is meant for launching for the first time in the US market; M/s. Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Ltd expected to get 180 days of exclusivity to market for this particular product; DRL will be treated as only player other than the innovator, M/s Eli Lilly in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Olanzapine 20mg in the local market. 4. Based on the above information, the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad L Division, Hyderabad considered the rebate claims filed by M/s. Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Ltd., as eligible by accepting the assessable value adopted by M/s Dr.Reddy s Laboratories Ltd., and accordingly sanctioned an amount of ₹ 21,11,04,089/- in cash and ₹ 1,75,48,551/- in cash and ₹ 8,986/- as credit to their CENVAT credit acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ise Act, 1944 and preferred two appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals - II), Hyderabad on 30.01.2012 on various grounds. 6. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No.02/2012 (H-IV) (D) CE dated 20.03.2012 and Orderin- Appeal No.03/2012 (H-IV) (D) CE dated 28.08.2012 allowed the appeals. 7. Thereupon, two show-cause notices were issued dated 03.05.2012 and 05.06.2012 to M/s Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd., calling for an explanation as to why an amount of ₹ 21,18,36,117/- and ͅ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, before the Joint Secretary (Revision Application), Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi against the Order-in-Appeal No.02/2012 (HIV) (D) CE dated 20.03.2012 and Order-in-Appeal No.03/2012 (H-IV) (D) CE dated 28.08.2012. The Joint Secretary (Revision Application) while passing an order dated 19.12.2013 in Revision Application Nos.195/594 & 1700/12-RA opined that the appellate authority while allowing the appeals filed by the depart .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- and ₹ 23,491/- were held admissible. The Commissioner (Appeals) by allowing the department s appeals implicitly held rebate claims inadmissible in toto. However, the said order No.53/2012 dated 30.10.2012 Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad - IV has already held in his Order-in- Original dated 30.10.2012 that the applicants are eligible for rebate claims of ₹ 8,91,295/- and ₹ 23,491/- In these cases, Government therefore modified the impugned Orders-in-Appeal to the ext .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rebate of ₹ 21,11,04,089/- and ₹ 1,75,57,537/-. 11. The final order No.21039/2015 dated 28.04.2015 was passed by the CESTAT, Bangalore in appeal No. E/25509/2013 - DB filed by M/s. Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Ltd., against O-I-O No.53/2012-Adjn. (Commissioner) CE dated 30.10.2012, in the light of the above Delhi High Court s decision and the impugned order raising demand for recovery of the amount was set aside. 12. In the present appeal, the order passed by the CESTAT, South Zonal Ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd drawn the attention of this Court to the judgment of the Delhi High Court passed in Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Ltd. v. Union of India 2014 (309) ELT 423 (Del.) , 14. The CESTAT, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore passed order based on the judgment of the Delhi High Court, wherein the order of the Department of Revenue dated 19.12.2013 Order Nos.1412-1413-CX, under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act was set aside while restoring the original rebate order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Custom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s.1412-1413-CX, under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act is hereby set aside, along with any consequential demands raised for recovery of the rebate of excise duty. The Orders in- Original No.462/2011 - REBAT E and No.3/2012- REBAT E, dated 30.09.2011 and 13.01.2012 are accordingly restored. There shall be no order as to costs. 16. Operative portion of the order of the Delhi Court clearly indicates that the consequential demands raised by the different authorities were set aside while restor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version