Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Versus M/s. Pradeep Industries

Calculation of deduction under Section 80HHC - Interpretation of term “Total turnover” - whether sale of scrap do not form part of the turnover? - Held that:- The proceeds generated from the sale of scrap would not be included in the ‘total turnover’. See Commissioner of Income Tax-VII vs. Punjab Stainless Industries [2014 (5) TMI 238 - SUPREME COURT ] – Decided against Revenue. - Net interest received considered for deducting 90% of interest income in compliance of explanation (baa) to Sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the "profits of the business" – Decided against Revenue. - Tax Case Appeal Nos.383 and 380 of 2007 - Dated:- 16-11-2016 - Nooty Ramamohana Rao And Anita Sumanth, JJ. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar JUDGMENT ( Judgment of the Court was delivered by Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. ) This Appeal is preferred under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

profit, and explanation (baa) would not apply to it, it would not form part of the total turnover for the purpose of calculation of deduction under Section 80HHC? (iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that only the net interest received is to be considered for deducting 90% of interest income in compliance of explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act? 3. Heard Shri T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tions of law incidentally have fallen for consideration of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-VII vs. Punjab Stainless Industries - (2014) 364 ITR 144 (SC). The Supreme Court had answered these two substantial questions of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. In view of the finality achieved, the first two substantial questions of law are accordingly answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. 6. In so far as the third substantial question of law is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Updates     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version