Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Twenty First Century Steel Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Chandigarh

2016 (11) TMI 1340 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

Demand - inputs not received by appellant, hence not eligible for CENVAT credit - Held that: - I am of the considered view that the adjudicating authority is required to examine the newspaper report before denial of credit to the appellant. If there is any truth in the newspaper report, the same may be considered as evidence produced by the appellant for receipt of the inputs. Both sides are real liberty to produce the evidence in their favour to reach to real conclusion whether the appellant ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se evidences and pass appropriate within 60 days. - Appeal No.E/171/2016 - FINAL ORDER NO 61289/2016 - Dated:- 1-9-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) On merit request for the Appellant Shri V. K. Tehran, A.R. for the Respondent Per : Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order denying that the vehicles used for transportation of the goods. 2. After hearing the parties, the facts of the case emerged as under: The appellant procured inputs from the main manufacturer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

invoice issued to the appellant are not capable of for transportation of goods as these vehicles registration numbers are of two wheeler/light motor vehicles. Therefore, it was alleged that the appellant have not received the inputs consequently they are not entitled to credit on the said inputs. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant. Consequently, the demand of duty alongwith interest confirmed and penalty on the appellant was also imposed. The penalties on the registered dealers and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o M/s Tata Steel & Iron Co. ltd. through demand draft in advance. These facts not disputed. The only allegation against the appellant is that the vehicle number mentioned in the invoices were not capable of transportation of the goods. In fact during the impugned period, the owner of vehicles had transported the goods used fake vehicle number to avoid local taxes to that effect they have produced the newspaper report which admits that during the impugned period, the owner of vehicles had tra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been produced by the Revenue to deny the credit. Moreover, the suppliers of the goods have admitted that they have supplied the goods and no statement of the transporter has been recorded to confirm that the goods have been transported by the vehicles owners. In that circumstance, the credit cannot be denied to the appellant. It is also on the merit that the lower authorities have not considered the submissions made by the appellant. Therefore, the impugned order is to be set aside and the matte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version