Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hema Mishra Versus State of UP

2014 (1) TMI 1771 - SUPREME COURT

Anticipatory bail - invoking jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 - Held that:- It compulsory for the police to issue a notice in all such cases where arrest is not required to be made under Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of the amended Section 41. But, all the same, unwillingness of a person who has not been arrested to identify himself and to whom a notice has been issued under Section 41A, could be a ground for his arrest. Legislation has laid down various parameters, warranting ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the powers naturally impose considerable responsibility in its application. All the same, the High Court has got the power and sometimes duty in appropriate cases to grant reliefs, though it is not possible to pin-point what are the appropriate cases, which have to be left to the wisdom of the Court exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - As also faced with the situation that on dismissal of the writ by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efs granted would also go. - This Court has already passed an interim order on 1.3.2013 granting bail to the appellant on certain conditions. The said order will continue till the completion of the trial. However, if the appellant is not co-operating with the investigation, the State can always move for vacating the order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as above. - In appropriate cases the High Court is empowered to entertain the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cannot be completely denuded of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution, to grant such a relief in appropriate and deserving cases; albeit this power is to be exercised with extreme caution and sparingly in those cases where arrest of a person would lead to total miscarriage of justice. - Criminal Appeal No. 146 of 2014 - Dated:- 16-1-2014 - K.S. Radhakrishnan And A.K. Sikri JJ. JUDGMENT K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant herein had invoked the extraordinary jurisdic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

site Party No. 2, and the Investigating Officer, Case Crime No. 797/11, under Sections 419/420 IPC, Police Station, Zaidpur, District Barabanki, the opposite party No. 3, to defer the arrest of the petitioner until collection of the credible evidence sufficient for filing the charge-sheet by following the amended proviso to Sections 41(1)(b) read with Section 41A CrPC; iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the Superintendent of Police, Barabanki, the o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioner and learned Additional Government Advocate. Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 797 of 2011, under Sections 419 & 420 IPC, police station Zaidpur, district Barabanki. We have gone through the FIR, which discloses commission of cognizable offence, as such, the same cannot be quashed. The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner being lady, it is provided that if she surrenders and moves application for bai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Superintendent of Police, Barabanki to defer the arrest of the appellant until the collection of credible evidence sufficient for filing the charge-sheet, following the amended proviso to Section 41(1)(b) read with Section 41A Cr. P.C. 5. The Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Board, Allahabad and the District School Inspector vide their letter dated 8.12.2011 registered a complaint alleging that the appellant had committed fraud and forgery in the matter of preparation of documents of Gove .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a representation on 27.12.2011 before the Superintendent of Police, District Barabanki and the Investigating Officer making the following prayer: As such through this application/representation the applicant prays that keeping in view the willingness of the applicant for cooperating in investigation and to appear before the investigating officer upon being called in case crime no. 797/11 u/Ss 419/420 IPC, PS Jaipdur, District Barabanki, order for staying the arrest of applicant be passed so that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reads as under: Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to direct that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of ₹ 50,000/- (Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the condition that she will join investigation as and when required and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 8. Shr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were not prima facie made out for registering the crime. Learned counsel also pointed out that the High Court has not properly appreciated the scope of Sections 41(1)(b) and 41A CrPC, 1973 and that no attempt has been made to follow those statutory provisions by the State and its officials. 9. Shri Gaurav Bhatia, learned AAG, appearing for the State, submitted that the investigation was properly conducted and the crime was registered. Further, it was also pointed out that the President has also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Article 226 of the Constitution of India, since the provision for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr. P.C. was consciously omitted by the State Legislature. The legislative intention is, therefore, not to seek or provide pre-arrest bail when the FIR discloses a cognizable offence. Shri Luthra submitted that since there is a conscious withdrawal/deletion of Section 438 CrPC by the Legislature from the Code of Criminal Procedure, by Section 9 of the Criminal Procedure (Uttar Prade .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st the appellant, was mala fide or violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, does not arise. Shri Luthra also submitted that the High Court was not correct in granting further reliefs after having dismissed the writ petition and that, only in extraordinary cases, the High Court could exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the case in hand does not fall in that category. 12. I may indicate that the legal issues raised in this case are no m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ommendation made by the 41st Law Commission, but in the State of Uttar Pradesh by Section 9 Criminal Procedure (Uttar Pradesh) Amendment Act, 1976, Section 438 was specifically omitted, the legality of which came up for consideration before the Constitution Bench of this Court in Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569 and the Court held that the deletion of the application of Section 438 in the State of Uttar Pradesh by Section 9 of the above mentioned Amendment Act does not offend eit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Karatar Singh s case (supra), this Court in sub-para (17) of Para 368, has also stated as follows: 368 xxx xxx xxx (17) Though it cannot be said that the High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application for bail under Article 226 of the Constitution and pass orders either way, relating to the cases under the Act 1987, that power should be exercised sparingly, that too only in rare and appropriate cases in extreme circumstances. But the judicial discipline and comity of courts require .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te of U.P. (1994 Cri.L.J. 1919). 16. We have, therefore, no concept of anticipatory bail as understood in Section 438 of the Code in the State of Uttar Pradesh. In Balchand Jain v. State of M.P. (1976) 4 SCC 572, this Court observed that anticipatory bail is a misnomer. Bail, by itself, cannot be claimed as a matter of right under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, except for bailable offences (Section 436 Cr.P.C., 1973). For non-bailable offences, conditions are prescribed under Sections 437 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s 41, 2(c) and 157(1) CrPC as well as the scope of Sections 437 and 439, held as follows: 47. In view of the above we answer the questions referred to the Full Bench as follows: (1) Even if cognizable offence is disclosed, in the FIR or complaint the arrest of the accused is not a must, rather the police officer should be guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P., 1994 Cr LJ 1981 before deciding whether to make an arrest or not. (2) The High Court should ordi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder Section 439 Cr.P.C. it is in the discretion of the learned Sessions Judge considering the facts and circumstances whether to decide the bail application the same day or not, and it is also in his discretion to grant interim bail the same day subject to the final decision on the bail application later. (3) The decision in Dr. Vinod Narain v. State of UP is incorrect and is substituted accordingly by this judgment. 17. This Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Oth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ending final disposal of the bail application. The Full Bench also observed that arrest is not a must whenever an FIR of a cognizable offence is lodged. The Full Bench placed reliance on the decision of this Court in Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (1994) 4 SCC 260. 7. We fully agree with the view of the High Court in Amarawati case and we direct that the said decision be followed by all courts in U.P. in letter and spirit, particularly since the provision for anticipatory bail does not exist in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Som Mittal v. State of Karnataka (2008) 3 SCC 753, while dealing with an order of the Karnataka High Court under Section 482 CrPC, one of the Judges made some strong observations as well as recommendations to restore Section 438 in the State of U.P. Learned Judges constituting the Bench also expressed contrary views on certain legal issues, hence, the matter was later placed before a three-Judge Bench, the judgment of which is reported in same caption (2008) 3 SCC 574, wherein this Court opine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a given case, which provides that an investigating officer shall not arrest the accused of such offences in a routine manner and the arrest be made, only after following the restrictions imposed under Section 41(b). The relevant provisions, as it stands now reads as follow: 41. When police may arrest without warrant.- (1) Any police officer may without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant, arrest any person - a) who commits, in the presence of a police officer, a cognizable offence; .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e said offence; ii) the police officer is satisfied that such arrest is necessary - a) to prevent such person from committing any further offence; or b) for proper investigation of the offence; or c) to prevent such person from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or tampering with such evidence in any manner, or d) to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns for making arrest as well as for not making an arrest in respect of a cognizable offence for which the maximum sentence is upto seven years. Reference in this connection may also be made to Section 41A inserted vide Act 5 of 2009 w.e.f. 01.11.2010, which reads as follows: 41A. Notice of appearance before police officer - (1) The police officer shall, in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 41, issue a notice directing the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce referred to in the notice unless, for reasons to be recorded, the police officer is of the opinion that he ought to be arrested. (4) Where such person, at any time, fails to comply with the terms of the notice or is unwilling to identify himself, the police officer may, subject to such orders as may have been passed by a competent Court in this behalf, arrest him for the offence mentioned in the notice. 21. Above mentioned provisions make it compulsory for the police to issue a notice in all .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Constitution of India. 22. I may, however, point out that there is unanimity in the view that in spite of the fact that Section 438 has been specifically omitted and made inapplicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh, still a party aggrieved can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being extraordinary jurisdiction and the vastness of the powers naturally impose considerable responsibility in its application. All the same, the High Court has got t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

relief against arrest for a specific period or till the completion of the trial. This Court in State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta reported in AIR 1952 SC 12, while dealing with the scope of Article 226 of the Constitution, held as follows :- Article 226 cannot be used for the purpose of giving interim relief as the only and final relief on the application. The directions had been given here only to circumvent the provisions of Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code, and that was not within t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r legal rights which entitled them to a writ of mandamus or any other directions of a like nature; and pending such determination it might have made a suitable interim order for maintaining the status quo ante. But when the Court declined to decide on the rights of the parties and expressly held that they should be investigated more properly in a civil suit, it could not, for the purpose of facilitating the institution of such suit, issue directions in the nature of temporary injunctions, under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l to the appellant on certain conditions. The said order will continue till the completion of the trial. However, if the appellant is not co-operating with the investigation, the State can always move for vacating the order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as above. A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. I have carefully gone through the judgment authored by my esteemed brother, Justice Radhakrishnan. I entirely agree with the conclusions arrived at by my learned brother in the said judgment. At the same time, I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntained in paragraph 21 of the judgment. It reads as under: We may, however, point out that there is unanimity in the view that in spite of the fact that Section 438 has been specifically omitted and made inapplicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh, still a party aggrieved can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being extraordinary jurisdiction and the vastness of the powers naturally impose considerable responsibility in its application. All .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the charge-sheet, the petitioners pray for interim relief against arrest. While entertaining the Writ Petition the High Court invariably grants such an interim relief. It is rightly pointed out that once the Writ Petition claiming main relief for quashing of FIR or the charge-sheet itself is dismissed, the question of granting further relief after dismissal of the Writ Petition, does not arise. It is so explained in para 22 and 23 of the judgment of my learned brother. 3. I would like to remark .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under Article 226 is filed with main prayer to quash those proceedings and to claim interim relief against pre-arrest in the meantime or till the completion of the trial. However, the considerations which have to weigh with the High Court to decide as to whether such proceedings are to be quashed or not are entirely different than that of granting interim protection against the arrest. Since the grounds on which such an FIR or charge sheet can be quashed are limited, once the Writ Petition chal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

available to the accused persons in the State of Uttar Pradesh, under the normal circumstances such an accused persons would not be entitled to claim such a relief under Art. 226 of the Constitution. It cannot be converted into a second window for the relief which is consciously denied statutorily making it a case of casus omissus. At the same time, as rightly observed in para 21 extracted above, the High Court cannot be completely denuded of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution, to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the wisdom of the High Court. What is emphasized is that the High Court is not bereft of its powers to grant this relief under Art. 226 of the Constitution. A Bench of this Court, headed by the then Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, laid down first principles of granting anticipatory bail in the Gurbaksh Singh v. State of Punjab 1980 Crl. L.J. 417 (P&H), reemphasizing that liberty. A person who has yet to lose his freedom by being arrested asks for freedom in the event of arrest. That is the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

do so. Arrest and detention in police lock-up of a person can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self esteem of a person. No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. It would be prudent for a police officer in the interest of protection of the constitutional rights of a citizen and perhaps in his own interest that no arrest should be made without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some investigation as to the g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n order of anticipatory bail does not in any way, directly or indirectly; take away for the police their right to investigate into charges made or to be made against the person released on bail. 7. The purposes for which the provisions of anticipatory bail are made are quite obvious. One of the purposes of the arrest is that the accused should be available to the investigating machinery for further investigation and questioning whenever he is required. Another purpose is that the trial should no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erein Justice K. Ramaswamy, speaking for the Court, discussed the importance of life and liberty in the following words. The foundation of Indian political and social democracy, as envisioned in the preamble of the Constitution, rests on justice, equality, liberty and fraternity in secular and socialist republic in which every individual has equal opportunity to strive towards excellence and of his dignity of person in an integrated egalitarian Bharat. Right to justice and equality and stated li .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of human dignity. One of the gifts of democracy to mankind is the right to personal liberty. Life and personal freedom are the prized jewels under Art.19 conjointly assured by Art.20(3), 21 and 22 of the Constitution and Art.19 ensures freedom of movement. Liberty aims at freedom not only from arbitrary restraint but also to secure such conditions which are essential for the full development of human personality. Liberty is the essential concomitant for other rights without which a man cannot b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uthority and order should be enforced by authority which is vested solely in the executive. Fundamental rights are the means and directive principles are essential ends in a welfare State. The evolution of the State from police State to a welfare State is the ultimate measure and accepted standard of democratic society which is an avowed constitutional mandate. Though one of the main functions of the democratic Government is to safeguard liberty of the individual, unless its exercise is subject .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

never be overbearing to justify total deprivation of individual liberty. Liberty cannot stand alone but must be paired with a companion virtue; liberty and morality; liberty and law; liberty and justice; liberty and common good; liberty and responsibility which are concomitants for orderly progress and social stability. Man being a rational individual has to life in harmony with equal rights of others and more differently for the attainment of antithetic desires. This intertwined network is dif .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hers. If liberty be regarded a social order, the problem of establishing liberty must be a problem of organizing restraint which society controls over the individual. Therefore, liberty of each citizen is borne of and must be subordinated to the liberty of the greatest number, in other words common happiness as an end of the society, lest lawlessness and anarchy will tamper social weal and harmony and powerful courses or forces would be at work to undermine social welfare and order. Thus the ess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parate entities but in a trinity. They form the union or trinity in the sense that to divorce one from the other is to defeat the very purpose of democracy. Liberty cannot be divorced from equality. Equality cannot be divorced from liberty. Nor can equality and liberty be divorced from fraternity. Without equality, liberty would produce supremacy of law. Equality without liberty would kill individual initiative. Without fraternity, liberty and equality would not become a natural course of things .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cenario, the question emerges whether the High Court under Art.226 would be right in entertaining proceedings to quash the charge-sheet or to grant bail to a person accused of an offence under the Act or other offences committed during the course of the same transaction exclusively triable by the Designated Court. Nothing is more striking than the failure of law to evolve a consistent jurisdictional doctrine or even elementary principles, if it is subject to conflicting or inconceivable or incon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stituent power engrafted under Art.226. A superior court is deemed to have general jurisdiction and the law presumes that the court has acted within its jurisdiction. This presumption is denied to the inferior courts. The judgment of a superior court unreservedly is conclusive as to all relevant matters thereby decided, while the judgment of the inferior court involving a question of jurisdiction is not final. The superior court, therefore, has jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

om the rule of validity is indispensable in its finality. The superior courts, therefore, are the final arbiters of the validity of the acts done not only by other inferior courts or authorities, but also their own decisions. Though they are immune from collateral attack, but to avoid confusion the superior court s decisions lay down the rules of validity; are not governed by those rules. The valid decision is not only conclusive, it may affect, but it is also conclusive in proceedings where it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and cases, the High Court would not be incorrect or acting out of jurisdiction if it exercises its power under Art.226 to issue appropriate writ or direction or order in exceptional cases at the behest of a person accused of an offence triable under the Act or offence jointly triable with the offences under the Act. 11. It is pertinent to mention that though the High Courts have very wide powers under Art.226, the very vastness of the powers imposes on it the responsibility to use them with circ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version