Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ANKUSH BANSAL S/O. NARESH BANSAL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1

Bail application - nature of offence - Prevention of Money Laundering - Held that:- As far as the allegations levelled against the present applicant are concerned, I have gone through the statement of the applicant himself. It appears that he was assisting his brother who was dealing with the cricket betting though he might be deciding or circulating the bhav (rate). The investigation is almost over and on completion of investigation, the present complaint has been filed by the authority. I have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; - [b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; - [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; - [d] not leave State of Gujarat and Union territory of Delhi without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; - [e] mark presence with the respondent No.2 every Monday for a period of three months and thereafter on any day of the first week of each English Calendar month for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO.14446 of 2015 - Dated:- 20-10-2015 - MR.JUSTICE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

im on bail during pendency of the bail in connection with ECIR No. - ECIR/03/AMZO/2015 [NOW PMLA Complaint No.8 of 2015] registered at the instance of the respondent No.2 - the authority appointed under the PMLA for the offences punishable under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the PMLA read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, the respondent No.2 has filed his affidavit dated 20.8.2015 and opposed this application by producing relevant doc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hable under Sections 418, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code alleging that the Enforcement department had raided a farm house on 19.3.2015 wherein it was found that 16 persons were indulging in Hawala racket and of cricket betting. An FIR was also lodged against 16 persons for the offences punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 read with Sections 65, 66 and 66C of the I.T. Act. The said FIR was registered as C.R. No.222 of 2015 with Kishanvadi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Unjha of District Mehsana as well as Ahmedabad and Mumbai. It was alleged in the FIR that during the raid, different types of electronic gadgets were discovered and about 147 Mobiles were collected which were being used for betting. The Sim Cards which were being used by those persons, found to be forged and the same were collected in bogus names. It was also found that by creating bogus documents and forging signatures in the applications form, different Sim Cards were purchased and the same we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hi and the applicant were found present and were indulging in illegal activities of cricket betting. The applicant - accused was called for by the Investigating Agency on 10.5.2015, 12.5.2015, 23.5.2015 and 24.5.2015 and his statements were recorded. Similarly, other accused were also interrogated. Ultimately, the respondent No.2 filed a complaint in the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), the Designated Special Court established under the PMLA being PMLA Complaint .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the application. Hence this application. 4. Mr. S. K. Gupta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Soeb R. Bhoharia with Valimohammed Pathan, Advocates appearing for the applicant has vehemently submitted that the complaint has been lodged for the so-called offence under Section 3 of PMLA which is punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA. However, the case of the applicant does not fall under the definition of offence of money laundering. He would submit that Section 3 of the PMLA provides that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been derived by the applicant through cricket betting would not fall under the proceeds of crime since betting is not a scheduled offence. He would submit that betting of cricket is not a scheduled offence since the scheduled offence is defined under Section 2 (y) of the PMLA. He would submit that the only allegation made in the complaint against the present applicant who is accused No.6 in the complaint is that he was actively helping his younger brother Ritesh Bansal @ Bharat Delhi who is accu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

other proceedings qua Code with regard to bail would be available. He would submit that he is not involved in any other offence punishable under PMLA in past. However, the offences under Gambling Act have been registered at Delhi in which he had been released on bail. 4.2 He would further submit that the investigation is over qua C.R. No.85 of 2015 registered with Kishanvadi Police Station wherein the applicant has not been made an accused. He would submit that since the applicant is not the acc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mposed by this Court and, therefore, he may be released on bail. 5. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel Ms. Trusha Patel appearing for the respondent No.2 - original complainant has vehemently submitted that huge scam of Hawala to the tune of about ₹ 2500 Crores has come in light in the game of Cricket betting. The investigation till date carried out and record recovered and seized from the Farm house at Vadodara on 19.3.2015 reveals that those four accused had received and placed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ities of betting which has been admitted by the applicant himself in his various statements. She would submit that the applicant is assisting his brother and used to decide rates (bhav) of betting as per the statement of his brother Ritesh Bansal. She, therefore, would submit that the applicant is aware about the betting being done from the place where he was assisting his brother who was directly in contact with the four other accused from whom the fabricated Sim Cards etc. have been found and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

therefore, is a proceeds of crime and, therefore, the case falls under Section 3 of the PMLA Act. 5.2 She would submit that under Section 24 of PMLA, the burden of proof is upon the accused person to prove that the money received by him is untainted one. She would submit that the applicant - accused has miserably failed in establishing that the money involved in the present complaint are untainted property. She, therefore, would submit that provisions of Section 45 of PMLA would be applicable an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plication No.1059 of 2012 wherein while dealing with the provisions of PMLA, this Court has held that certain presumptions are to be drawn as per Section 23 of PMLA. She, therefore, would submit that the application be rejected. 5.3 In alternate, she would submit that even otherwise, considering the gravity of offence and the maximum punishment provided under the PMLA Act, the Court may not use his powers under Section 439 of the Code. 6. I have heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA Act read as under :- 3. Offence of money-laundering - Whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money-laundering. 4. Punishment for money-laundering - Whoever commits the offence of money-laundering shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all be guilty of offence of money laundering when he is directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected proceeds of crime including the concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property. The definition of proceeds of crime: provided in Section 2 (u) reads as under :- 2 (u) proceeds of crime means any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the above, if the Schedules to the Act are perused, the applicant is not charged with any of the offences punishable under PMLA referred in the Schedule. It is pertinent to note that the applicant is facing charge only for the offences punishable under PMLA and is not the accused wherein the allegations of cheating, forgery etc. have been made against other accused which are scheduled offence. Therefore, there might be some illegal activities committed by the applicant i.e. with regard to cri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release; and (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail: Provided that a person who is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or infirm, may be released on bail, if the special court so directs: Provided further that the S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nvestigate into an offence under this Act unless specifically authorised, by the Central Government by a general or special order, and, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.] (2) The limitation on granting of bail specified in sub-section (1) is in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail. 12. Section 24 of PMLA reads as under :- 24. Burden of Proof - When a person is accused of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the time of dealing with an application for bail. 14. Under Section 45 (2) of PMLA, the other provisions of the Code would be applicable and, therefore, the case is to be dealt with accordingly. Therefore, I am dealing with the same. As far as the allegations levelled against the present applicant are concerned, I have gone through the statement of the applicant himself. It appears that he was assisting his brother who was dealing with the cricket betting though he might be deciding or circulati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rdinate Bench of this Court (Coram :- Hon'ble Ms. Justice Harsha Devani) in the case of Afroz Mohmad Hasanfatta v. Deputy Director and another, Criminal Misc. Application No.17000 of 2014. I have also gone through another unreported decision dated 31.3.2015 of the coordinate Bench of this Court (Coram :- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Paresh Upadhyay) in the case of Rakesh Manekchand Kothari v. Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, in Criminal Misc. Application No.3637 of 2015 wherein the coord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o-accused was subsequently heard. 17. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with ECIR No.- ECIR/03/AMZO/2015 [Now PMLA Complaint No.8 of 2015] registered at the instance of the respondent No.2, on executing a bond of ₹ 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with two local sureties of ₹ 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version