New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Chhabra Fashion C/o Kapil Goel Adv. Versus ITO Ward 26 (2) New Delhi

Enhancement of income - powers of CIT(A) - Held that:- As far as the issue of enhancement of income by the Ld. CIT (A) is concerned, as in the case of CIT vs. Sardari Lal & Company [2001 (9)1130 - Delhi High Court] has held that CIT (A) has no power to direct the AO to bring to tax a new source of income, which is not considered by the AO in the order appealed against him. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court observed that wherever the question of taxability of income from a new source of income is conc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ved its own decision in the case of CIT vs. Union Tyre (1999 (9)81 - DELHI High Court) and CIT vs. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry (1962 (2)12 - SUPREME Court ) and CIT vs. Rai Bahadur Hardutroy Motilal Chamaria (1967 (4)8 - SUPREME Court). - Thus we hold that the Ld. CIT (A) did not have the power to enhance the income of the assessee in the instant case and the enhancement made by him is beyond the powers conferred upon him by the statute. -Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 4614/Del/2011 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee firm had disclosed a turnover of ₹ 21,08,032/- and income from job work and fabrication at ₹ 1,62,93,530/-. Thus, the aggregate turnover was ₹ 1,84,01,562/- on which a net profit of ₹ 1,55,326/- was declared. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee firm failed to submit the books of accounts and other bills/vouchers. The assessee also did not submit any details regarding TDS on salary, fabrication and job work payments. The AO rejected the trading .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t bring any material on record to justify the application of net profit rate of 8%. The Ld. CIT (A) further observed that the assessee had itself admitted that there had been a delay in making the payment of TDS to the account of the Government. The Ld. CIT (A) gave a finding that TDS amounting to ₹ 94,638/- had been deducted on job work charges of ₹ 97,68,528/- for the period April, 2004 to February, 2005 but the payment was made to the Government Account only on 29.11.2005. The Ld. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 97,68,528/- while deleting the addition of ₹ 14,72,124/-. 2.2 Aggrieved the assessee has preferred an appeal before the ITAT and the revised grounds of appeal read as under: 1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) erred in illegally enhancing the taxable income of appellant by first time invoking section 40(a)(ia) of the Act by ignoring the factual realities where only one contract was performed by assessee and profits were estimated by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

40(a)(ia) of the Act amounting to ₹ 97,68,528/- without appreciating that section 40(a)(ia) being punitive in character needs strict interpretation and as held is subject to theory of doubtful penalization and cannot convert gross receipts to assessee s taxable income . 4. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) erred in making disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act amounting to ₹ 97,68,528/- without appreciating that said provision is not a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld enhancement made is beyond the powers of CIT (A). ii) To delete disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. iii) To make the reasonable estimate of profits. iv) Any other condign relief as per facts of instant case. That the appellant craves leave to add, to amend, modify, rescind, supplement or alter any of the grounds stated herein above, either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal. 3. The Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT (A) had erred in applying the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of income, no disallowance shall be made and, therefore, the AO may be directed to verify the status of the payment in the hands of the payee and then make a disallowance, if so required by law. On the issue of estimation of profits, the Ld. AR submitted that the net profit rate of 8% had been applied without giving any reasonable basis and, therefore, the same was not sustainable. 4. The Ld. DR relied heavily on the order of the Ld. CIT (A) on the issue of enhancement of income and submitted th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version