Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

RAINBOW EXPORTS AND 5 Versus BANK OF BARODA AND 2

Proceedings under SERFAESI Act - prayer to set aside the notices - Held that:- It is quite clear that the District Magistrate, upon an application being filed by the respondent Bank under Section 14 of the SERFAESI Act, has only issued a notice/summons to the petitioners to remain present on 07th November, 2016 and answer the case. It is this notice which is challenged by the petitioners and it is at this stage that the petitioners have filed this petition. It appears that the petitioners sent l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ge and in the circumstances obtained. The self-convenient act of on part of the petitioners to file present petition seeking to invoke the writ powers of the Court are indeed not well conceived in law and partakes an abuse of process of law, warranting a strict view. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19295 of 2016 - Dated:- 25-11-2016 - MR. N.V.ANJARIA, J. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR JAL SOLI UNWALLA WITH MS TEJAL A VASHI, ADVOCATE CAV JUDGMENT Heard learned advocate Mr.Jal Soli Unwalla assisted by le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 2.1 The prayer is made to set aside the notices produced collectively at Annexure-A issued by the District Magistrate. What is further prayed is to quash the proceedings before the District Magistrate pending in the nature of Case No.17 of 2016 being proceedings under Section 14 of the SERFAESI Act. 3. A prelude of relevant facts may be necessary to have the total factual picture. Around the years 2004-05, the respondent Bank appears to have sanctioned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

granted by the Bank to the petitioner. Further mortgage was made for the same purpose, of other properties by the second petitioner herein. 3.1 It is the further case that somewhere around 18th July, 2006 another partnership firm named M/s.Rainbow Industries-the sixth respondent herein was incorporated with petitioner Nos.2 and 3 as partners. The said Rainbow Industries also extended the credit facility for which petitioner Nos.2 to 5 mortgaged property bearing Survey No.970/1 Paiki situated at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as made to sell the property bearing Survey No.970/1 Paiki which was jointly owned by petitioner Nos.2 to 5 and mortgaged with the Bank as stated above. Agreement to Sell came to be executed on 24th December, 2012 in favour of one M/s.Yogamrut Developers who later on defaulted in the payment of installment of the sale price. As the dues of the Bank were seen in jeopardy, the sanction limit of the credit facility to the petitioner No.1 firm-M/s.Rainbow Exports was revisited with and was reduced. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l Senior Civil Judge, Mehsana against the present petitioners as well as the respondent Bank. The Civil Court, Mehsana allowed Exhibit 5 application of injunction in favour of the plaintiffbuyer which is in force. The Suit is pending having been transferred to the Civil Court at Visnagar registered as Special Civil Suit No.91 of 2015. 3.5 As the dues of Bank was not paid by petitioner No.1, disputes between petitioner No.1 and the Bank arose and recurred time and again. The correspondence was so .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s obtained by petitioner No.1, were mentioned to be ₹ 03,64,09,947/-. The notice was affixed on the same day on the property in question being revenue Survey No.978/1 and the petitioners were orally informed, by the Regional Manager of the Bank, the petitioners have averred. The petitioners have further stated that they visited the Bank and addressed letters and also addressed letter dated 15th March, 2016 through advocate. It is sought to be stated by the petitioners that the Bank wrongly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer. The notices regarding possession was published in two newspapers on 08th June, 2016. 3.7.1 The Bank has filed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal Original Application No.261 of 2016 which was served on the petitioners on 13th June, 2016 and 14th June, 2016, along with order of injunction dated 02nd May, 2016 whereunder the petitioners are restrained from dealing with the property. 3.7.2 On 26th March, 2016, the petitioners themselves approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal by filing Securiti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntioned-(i) M/s.Yogamrut Developers filed Special Civil Application No.12431 of 2016 challenging the order passed by the Civil Court below Exhibit 57 in Special Civil Suit No.91 of 2015. This Court directed the petitioner to deposit ₹ 05.00 crores with the Bank; (ii) Petitioner preferred Letters Patent Appeal as it was ex-parte order; (iii) Letters Patent Appeal was withdrawn with liberty reserved to the appellantpetitioner to move learned Single Judge with appropriate application; (iv) pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ined that they were directed to remain present for hearing by issuing summons by the Magistrate. 5. The aforesaid conspectus of facts is highlighted only for the purpose as it vividly demonstrates as to how the petition is thoroughly misconceived and premature. The whole set of the contentions sought to be agitated by the petitioners herein involve going into facts. The petitioners have remedy at an appropriate later stage to file an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Bank presented under Section 14 of the Act. No order is passed by the learned Magistrate. The petitioners are called upon to remain present and answer the case. 5.2 Even otherwise and even at later stage after final order which may be passed by the Magistrate in the proceedings complained against, the petitioners could approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for agitating their grievances. In Union Bank of India Vs Satyavati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110] the Apex Court observed thus, the High Court ov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court must keep in mind that the legislations enacted by Parliament and State Legislatures for recovery of such dues are code unto themselves inasmuch as they not only contain comprehensive procedure for recovery of the dues but also envisage constitution of quasi judicial bodies for redressal of the grievance of any aggrieved person. Therefore, in all such cases, High Court must insist that before availing remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution, a person must exhaust the remedies availab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST Invoice

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version