New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (12) TMI 761 - CESTAT KOLKATA

2016 (12) TMI 761 - CESTAT KOLKATA - TMI - Exemption benefit under Notification No.30/2004 dated 09.07.2004 - import of undyed and unprinted silk fabrics - non-fulfillment of condition stipulated in notification - Held that: - It is noted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SRF Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Customs, Chennai [2015 (4) TMI 561 - SUPREME COURT] on the identical issue, allowed the appeal of the importer where the CEGAT found that only those conditions could be satisfied which were po .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emption from payment of CVD in terms of Notification No. 6/02. - In view of the above, I do not find any reason to interfere with the Order of the Ld.Commissioner (Appeals) - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - Appeal Nos. C/217/10, C/140/10 & 3)C/141/10 - ORDER NO. FO/A/76184-86/16 - Dated:- 9-11-2016 - Shri P.K.Choudhary, Member (Judicial) Shri K.C.Jena, ADC(AR) for the Appellant Shri S.K.Mehata, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri P. K. Choudhary 1. Heard both sides and p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the issue is covered in favour of the respondents by various decisions as under:- a) Prashray Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Customs, Chennai [2008(232) E.L.T.63 (Tri.-Chennai)] b) Prashray Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Customs, Chennai [2009(235) E.L.T.300 (Tri.-Chennai)] c) Mapsa Tapes Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Cus. & C.Ex., Delhi-IV [2009(247) E.L.T. 188(Tri.-Del.)] d) SRF Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Customs, Chennai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se needs to be examined without reference to other notifications but only with reference to the specific terms of the subject notification. We have already reproduced the relevant condition attached to Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. ibid. Admittedly, both the yarn and fabric are eligible for exemption from payment of duty of excise under the above notification subject to the above condition. The question now arises as to whether this condition works in relation to the goods imported by the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r raw silk). On this basis, it is submitted that the question of a manufacturer of silk yarn availing Cenvat credit on input does not arise and, to this extent, the condition attached to the notification is irrelevant. It is further submitted that, for the silk fabric, the input is silk yarn, which is also claimed to be not chargeable to duty of excise by virtue of the above notification. Both parties agree that when silk yarn was imported during the material period no CVD was required to be pai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

claim Cenvat credit on his input. In other words, there was no question of such manufacturer availing input-duty credit, the input being not chargeable to duty of excise. In this view of the matter, the demand of CVD on the yarn and fabric imported by the appellants is not sustainable in law. The impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed. 5. It is noted that the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of SRF Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Customs, Chennai (Supra) on the identical issue, allowed the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pronounced by this very Bench in the case of AIDEK Tourism Services Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi [Civil Appeal No. 2616 of 2001 - 2015 (318) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)], the principle which was laid down in Thermax Private Limited and Hyderabad Industries Limited was summarised in the following manner :- 15. The ratio of the aforesaid judgment in Thermax Private Limited (supra) was relied upon by this Court in Hyderabad Industries Ltd. (supra) while interpreting Section 3(1) of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version