Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sukhraj Singh alias Raja Versus Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement

2016 (12) TMI 816 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Money Laundering - bail application - Held that:- The nature and scope of offences imputed in the present case are entirely different from those covered in the previous case, which was drawn up under the NDPS Act. Here, the basic allegations are overwhelmingly financial in nature and the petitioner is alleged to have indulged in 'Money Laundering' by way of investing/utilizing a huge amount of money allegedly generated by him from illegal activities. His own statements recorded under section 50 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-2016 - Surya Kant And Sudip Ahluwalia, JJ. Mrs. G.K.Mann, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Reeta Kohli, Addl. AG Punjab Ms. Ranjana Shahi, for the respondent ORDER Sudip Ahluwalia, J. This is a petition for bail preferred on behalf of the petitioner in Complaint No.3/2016 Dated 27.4.2016 under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, filed by the respondent/Assistant Director, Enforcement, Government of India, Jalandhar. A number of FIRs registered against the various a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot the petitioner declared a Proclaimed Offender, vide an order dated 27.11.2014, after which, he was allegedly nabbed in the vicinity of the Delhi Airport on 13.8.2015. While thus remaining in detention in connection with the aforesaid FIR No.45 dated 3.3.2013, he was taken into custody in the present complaint case on 29.2.2016 and was also subjected to interrogation. He thereafter filed the instant bail petition on 19.9.2016. 3. It has been opposed on behalf of the respondent/Assistant Direct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the amount totaling ₹ 5 Crores during the period from 2007 to 2013 through 'Hawala Channels', which was the earning from the Drugs and that Jagdish Singh @ Bhola had told him that he will purchase land for him out of his share in the said amount. The respondent has also contended that about three acres of agricultural land was purchased by Jagdish Singh @ Bhola for the present petitioner in the name of his younger brother Jaswinder Singh, who is also residing in Canada for an amo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hase price of the property was shown as ₹ 16,65,000/- only, although an amount of ₹ 1,07,00,000/- was actually paid in cash and that the petitioner has not filed any Income tax return. The respondent has also opposed the bail prayer by contending that the petitioner is a habitual offender and a separate charge sheet has been filed against him in FIR No.180 Dated 22.7.2009 at Police Station Focal Point, Ludhiana under N.D.P.S. Act. 4. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version