Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Shakti Textiles Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II

2016 (12) TMI 990 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Valuation - non-inclusion of value of shrinkage - Held that: - if the claim of the appellant that they have already included a value which need not be included, is true, then the addition of value of shrinkage to the tune of 2.4% is uncalled for in these facts - to ascertain the fact that the appellant has included more value than it is due, only for limited purpose we remit the matter back to the lower authorities - appeal allowed by way of remand. - Appeal No. E/3681/05 - Mum - Order No.A/9409 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of shrinkage for discharging the Central Excise duty by the appellant for the period 1992 to March 1995, differentia! duty was demanded based on the finding that in an annual stock taking exercise on 16/2/1905 it was noticed that the actual shrinkage of the processed fabrics was 6.4% while appellant had included only 4% for arriving at the cost of raw material. We find from the records that the show cause notice is issued on 13/9/2006 by invoking extended period for the demand of duty. The appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ost of raw material + job charges+ 10% of cost of raw material plus job charges. it is her submission that this factual submission is not controverted to by the lower authorities. She would submit that the Apex Court in the case of Ujagar Prints 1989 (39) ELT 493 has settled the law as to assessable value in the hands of job worker shall be of raw materials plus job charges. It is her submission that the additional amount considered by them as 10% of raw material plus job charges, should take ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al Foundation Joint-Venture 2007 (216) ELT 177 for the proposition that ET mere omission and various circulars and decisions holding a particular view during the material period if followed, it cannot be considered as mis-statement or suppression. 5. Learned departmental representative would that for discharging duty liability by the job processor, the assessable value should be the value of pre-shrunk fabrics and the job charges. In the case in hand, undisputedly appellant had not considered th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arriving at the assessable value to be included with the value of pre-shrunk fabrics to the extent of 2.4 % which. was not included while it is the case of tile appellant assessable value on which duty is paid is more the vague as is sought to be applied. 8. We that has taking a consistent stand before the lower authorities that assessable worked by them would take care of the value which is sought to be included in the impugned orders. We note that the lower authorities have not disputed the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version