GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (12) TMI 1064 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (12) TMI 1064 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Demand - Foreign Agent Commission - reverse charge mechanism - limitation period - Held that: - the services were provided outside India and tax liability fell on the appellant on reverse charge basis, a bona fide belief entertained by the appellant was justified. Further, the appellant has been reflecting the payment of commission in their balance sheet in which case, it can be held that there was no suppression or mis-statement on the part of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) And Mr. V Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri Ashutosh Upadhyay, Advocate for the Appellants Shri Sanjay Jain, AR for the Respondent Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): Demand of service tax stands confirmed against the appellant along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalties on the ground that they were required to pay the same on reverse charge basis in respect of Foreign Agent Commission service so received by them during the period 2006-200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the period prior to the said date, the issue is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. 3. Learned Advocate assails the demand on limitation by submitting that in as much as the issue was the subject matter of litigation before various courts and was finally decided by Hon'ble Bombay High Court on 11.12.2008, the assessee was under bona fide belief that no service tax liability would fall upon them on reverse charge basis. He also draws our attention to the B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ircular was withdrawn only on 10.05.2007, they continued to entertain the belief that since the services of foreign commission agent were provided outside India, no service tax liability. However, he agrees that part of the demand would fall within limitation and is not contesting the same. 4. Learned Departmental Representative submits that though they were reflecting the payments made to their foreign buyers in their balance sheet, but the same were never made available to Revenue. He further .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version