TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1459X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... N/N. 1/93-CE dated 28.02.1993, we find that the present appeals are not maintainable before this Court - appeal not maintainable - liberty to the appellant to avail of its appropriate remedy - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant. - CEA No. 65 of 2015(O&M) - - - Dated:- 16-12-2016 - Rajesh Bindal And Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ. Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocatefor the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the residential premises of their employees and during follow-up investigation of the case. (ii) Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal is correct in holding that extended period of limitation is not invokable even when the party had indulged into fraud, willfully suppressed/mis-declared the material facts and also resorted to manufacturing and clearing goods without payment of duty with the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ial Machine's case (supra). As the issue involved in the present appeals is pertaining to the rate of duty with reference to exemption under notification No. 1/93-CE dated 28.02.1993, we find that the present appeals are not maintainable before this Court. Consequently, all appeals as well as the applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeals are dismissed. However, with lib ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
