Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Gogia Brothers Versus CST, Delhi

2017 (1) TMI 163 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Valuation - works contract - payment of service tax on 20% of the value - Electrical wiring, fittings and related services - demand - on 80% of the consideration received the appellant failed to discharge service tax under the category of management, maintenance and repair services. It was held that the appellants artificially spilt-up the consideration received in two components:- 80% towards supply of materials and 20% towards rendering of services. - Held that: - revenue is not correct to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

It was further asserted that this can be established from their accounts and the bills raised to the recipient of service. - Demand set aside - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Service Tax Appeal No. 55203/2013(DB) - 55976/2016 - Dated:- 14-12-2016 - Shri S. K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) And Shri B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Shri A.K. Batra, Advocate for the appellant Ms. Neha Garg, DR for the respondent ORDER Per B. Ravichandran The appeal is filed against the impug .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

epair services . It was held that the appellants artificially spilt-up the consideration received in two components - 80% towards supply of materials and 20% towards rendering of services. The lower authority found such arrangements as legally not tenable and accordingly, confirmed service tax on full consideration value received by the appellant. 2. Ld. Consultant for the appellant submitted that mainly on the following grounds (a) contract with various organizations and autonomous bodies like .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Finance Act, 2012 (Section 98), which excluded non-commercial Government building from the purview of the tax liability. 3. Ld. AR contested the submissions of the appellant. She drew our attention to the contents of the work order and the findings thereafter. It is her contention that such bifurcation 80% to 20% cannot be validly accepted for charging service tax in absence of actually supply of materials. In fact the Original Authority has recorded that the supply of materials was to the effec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he actual quantity of supply of materials, it is not correct on the part of the Original Authority to confirm the tax liability on the whole of the consideration ignoring the terms of the work order. In other words, the whole work order has been considered as service contract only and subjected to levy to the full. We find such assertion is factually untenable. No examination of quantum of materials supplied has been made. The appellant s claim based on the written contract, as agreed upon by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version