Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Rkkr Shiksha Foundation Versus Income Tax Officer (Exemptions)

2017 (1) TMI 452 - ITAT DELHI

Exemption claimed u/s. 11/12 - denial of claim on the ground that the assessee society is not registered u/s. 12AA for the relevant AY - Held that:- We find that the addition of ₹ 1,58,27,052/- is confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) solely on the ground that the assessee had not been granted Certificate of Registration u/s. 12A of the I.T. Act, 1961. We find that Ld. CIT(E) vide his order dated 19.8.2016 passed u/s. 154 of the Act has rectified the mistake by stating that the benefit of registrati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n in dispute. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No. 305/DEL/2016 - Dated:- 4-1-2017 - Shri H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member And Shri Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Member Assessee by : Sh. Anil Kanoida, CA Department by : Sh . Umesh Chand Dubey, Sr. DR ORDER Per H. S. Sidhu, JM Assessee has filed this Appeal against the impugned Order dated 17.11.2015 passed by the Ld. CIT(A), Gurgaon on the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mption u/s. 11/12 of the Act as Tribunal vide order dated 2.11.2010 directed the CIT to grant Certificate of Registration u/s. 12A of the Act. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming income of ₹ 1,58,27,052 though the appellant had been given benefit of section 11/12 for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12 on the basis of ITAT order. 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing. 2. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rom time to time. The assessee Company is registered u/s. 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. No business activities had been carried out by the assessee company during the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. The only source of income is interest on FDR. The assesee in its return had claimed exemption u/s. 11 of the I. T. Act. Assessee was asked to furnish Certificate u/s. 12A for the relevant year. The assessee replied that registration u/s. 12A was not granted by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

05 - 215253) was treated as profits from business and professional and added back to the income of the assessee. Accordingly, the AO assessed the income of the assessee at ₹ 1,58,27,050/- vide his order dated 16.3.2015 passed u/s. 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 3. Against the assessment order, the asseessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who vide his impugned order dated 17.11.2015 has dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing that the AO has denied the exemption claimed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eals that the assesse has been granted registration u/s. 12AA for the AY 2015-16 onwards. As such the assessee is not registered u/s. 12AA for the year under reference. Ld. CIT(A) has discussed this fact with the AR of the assessee who explained that the registration u/s. 12AA had been wrongly given by the CIT(E) w.e.f AY 2015-16 although the date of application u/s. 12A was 26.6.2009. The assessee contended that he was in fact eligible for registration u/s. 12AA w.e.f AY 2010-11 and as such the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Counsel of the assessee has filed a copy of the order dated 19.8.2016 passed u/s. 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 by the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh wherein the following order has been passed:- Order u/s. 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 In continuation to Order u/s. 12AA dated 20.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh, the year from which the benefit of registration u/s. 12AA needs to be given inadvertently written as Assessment Year 2015-16 instead of Assessment year 2009-10 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

held as under:- Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3 states that the orders under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been passed rectifying the order dated 20.5.2015 under Section 12AA of Act. This is communicated by a letter dated 19.8.2016 wherein it is stated that inadvertently the year from which the benefit of registration was written as Assessment Year 2015-16 instead of Assessment year 2009-10 . The same was accordingly rectified. A copy of the letter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itled to appear before the CIT(A) and the Tribunal to invite their attention to a copy of this order. 3. Disposed of. 5.3 In view of the above, Ld. Counsel of the assessee has requested that keeping in view of the rectification order passed u/s., 154 dated 19.8.2016 passed by the Ld. CIT(E) and the decision dated 1.9.2016 of the Hon ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, the Appeal of the assesee may be allowed and orders of the lower authorities may be set aside. 6. On the other ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version