Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Circle-1, Junagadh Versus Shri Pragjibhai Gokaldas Nathwani, Prop. of Mangrol Oil

Disallowance excess payment made u/s 40 A(2)(b) - payment to the specified person - excessive and unreasonable expenditure - Held that:- We have gone through the submission of both the sides and find that the assessee has made payment excess by 3% to the three above stated related parties because of sourcing of double filter edible oil. We observed that it is clear that double filter oil is more costly than the filter oil and it also fetch more price in the market than the filtered oil. We find .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the expenses were incurred in cash and the vouchers not contained the detail of rate of payment and the destination where the oil was delivered. We find that the assessing officer had not pointed out any specific defects and the disallowance was made on general assumption that expenses were incurred in cash and the vouchers not contained the detail of rate of payment and the destination where the oil was delivered for want of proper maintenance of vouchers. Looking to the volume of expenditure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ankers to storage tanks and therefore into the packing material such as bottles, jars tins and pouches. We find that the assessing officer had disallowed the shortage in oil without any supporting material just on the basis of presumption and guess work. In view of the above stated facts and findings, we considered that the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) is justified in allowing the claim of the assessee. - ITA No. 575/Rjt/2014 - Dated:- 2-1-2017 - Shri Rajpal Yadav, Judicial Member And Shri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 2, 19, 919/- u/s.40A(2)(b). The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have upheld the same. 2. On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in restricting the 'KHARA JAT EXPENSES. ' The Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed expenses of ₹ 81,863/- @ 3% as againstRs.2,72,876/- @ 10% disallowed out of total expenses of ₹ 27,28, 756/-. 3. On facts and circumstances of the case and in law .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessment proceedings the assessing officer has observed that assessee has made certain payment to the person specified under section 40 A(2)(b) of the act. The AO has selected three related parties from the annexture furnished by the assessee from the whom purchases were made. The Assessing Officer observed that assessee had paid higher price for the purchases from the following related parties:- Sr. No. Name of Payee Purchases (Rs.) 1 Mangrol Oil Industries 1,02,82,130/- 2 Shri Mangrol Oil Mi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of the assessee and disallowed excess payment to the extent of ₹ 2,19,919 made to the specified person by invoking the provision of section 40 A(2)(b) of the act. Aggrieved against the addition made by the assessing officer, the assessee has filed appeal before the learned CIT(appeal). The learned CIT(appeal) has allowed the appeal of the assessee. The decision of the learned CIT(appeal) is reproduced as under 4. I have perused the assessment order and the written submission put forth be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appellant contended that, when a person has to keep up with his brand image, it would only be prudence on his part to make certain higher payments, as by doing so, ho ensures smooth sourcing, regular supply and consistency in quality for his products. It is also seen that the appellant deals with filtered edible oil and double filtered edible oil. It is obvious that the double filtered edible oil fetches more price and vis-a-vis, it also costs more too. Therefore, looking to the nature of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

)(b) can be termed as excessive, particularly, when the appellant is dealing in a branded product which is edible in nature. Therefore, the AO was too harsh in disallowing a ,sum of ₹ 2,19,919/- u/s. 40A(2)(b) of the I T Act, particularly, when they were not abnormally excessive and beyond any reasonable imagination. Therefore, the disallowance made is directed to be deleted. In the result, this ground of the appellant is allowed. It is also seen from the records that, similar additions ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

clear that double filter oil is more costly than the filter oil and it also fetch more price in the market than the filtered oil. We find that learned CIT appeal has justified his decision keeping in view the nature of business, volume and quality of products involved. In view of above facts and findings, we do not find any reason to interfere in the finding of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (appeal). Disallowance out of Kharagat expenses 6. During the course of assessment proceedings, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r stated that it cannot be said that the expenditure was not genuine merely on the reasoning that the expenses were incurred in cash. However, he requested the assessing officer to restrict the disallowance out of cash expenses to the extent of 1% of these expenses which comes to ₹ 27,288/.The assessing has not fully accepted the explanation of the assessee and restricted the disallowance to the extent of 10% of expenditure of ₹ 27,28,756 paid by cash. Against this addition, the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e not verifiable. He accordingly disallowed lump sump 10% out of the same. The only adverse inference drawn by him was that, the vouchers do not contain serial number, rate of payment, destination where Groundnut Oil / Cottonseed Oil is delivered and the vouchers are not signed by any supervisor / manager. Against, the AR submitted that, the appellant's books of account were audited under the provisions of Section 44AB of the Act and that the appellant's return was accompanied by such au .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

noticed that the assessing officer had disallowed 10% of the Kaharjat expenses incurred in cash of ₹ 2, 72,8,756 - incurred in cash on the ground that most of the expenses were incurred in cash and the vouchers not contained the detail of rate of payment and the destination where the oil was delivered. We find that the assessing officer had not pointed out any specific defects and the disallowance was made on general assumption that expenses were incurred in cash and the vouchers not conta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

officer observed that the assessee has claimed shortage of 54670 kgs. In this connection, he stated that the shortage to be on the higher side as the assessee was not manufacturing the oil. He therefore allowed shortage to the extent of 3038 kg out of ground nut oil and 2432 Kg. out of cotton seed oil resulted in addition of ₹ 28,39,945/- to the total income of the assessee. The assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A). 10. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as high as 90%. No independent inquiries were carried out by him. There is nothing on record to prove that the appellant's claim of shortage was bogus. On the other hand, it is the contention of the Id. AR of the appellant that, the claim of loss is as meager as 0.19% and 0.23% of Oil and cotton seeds oil, out of the total purchases. This shortage in real sense works out to only a fraction of the total quantity purchased by the appellant during the year. The finally packed consumable ranges .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of shifting loose oil, some portion of oil remains in tanker itself in view of the fact that the oil is having sticky characteristics. Further due to oval shape of tankers, o^t upto a certain level remains below the exit pipe, which can be termed as dead level. Hence such quantity of oil also forms part of shortage. Further during the transmission of oil some portion gets leaked from tubes. Therefore such waste also forms part of shortage. After transferring the oil to shortage tanks, the oil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version