Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner Commercial Tax, U.P. Lucknow Versus S/S. Sri Supreme Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd.

2017 (1) TMI 578 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Evasion of tax - goods transported under the cover of TDF - consignors and consignees are non-existent - seizure - Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, seizure of goods and demand of cash security for its release under Section 48 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 is valid? - Held that: - the goods in question originated for transportation from Ghaziabad, were being carried by the respondent in a fraudulent manner under the cover of bogus invoices with fictitious TIN numbers printed the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

suffer from any illegality. - Whether Delhi - U.P. Border area of District Ghaziabad is "no-man's land"? - Held that: - the circular dated 31.01.1987 is non-existent. That apart, it has no relevance in view of the facts found and the constitutional provisions mentioned above. Delhi - U.P. Border area of District Ghaziabad is not "no man's land" rather it is part of District Ghaziabad (U.P.). - Whether transporters are strangers to the transaction of sale and purchase and totally ignorant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the episode of fictitious transaction with sole purpose of evasion of tax by undisclosed non-bonafide dealers. By seizure of goods in such cases transporter is not affected if he is really a transporter - Therefore, instead of being torch bearer of dishonest persons, he should allow the real consignors or consignees to come forward and assign reasons for concealing their real identity. The action of the departmental authorities in such cases to unearth evasion of tax is one of their fundamental .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the Act have no power to seize the goods and demand security for release thereof but where, as in the present case, the transaction is sham, not genuine and make-believe and originated from a place within the State of U.P. or intended to be sold within the State of U.P. with intent to evade tax then it would be a case falling under Section 48 of the Act. Provisions of Sections 48 & 52 of the Act, have to be considered in a manner so as to hold that it serves to seek a reasonable result. Protec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nsel for the respondents. This revision was admitted on 13.12.2016 on the questions of law. Facts of the Case:- 2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that on 03.10.2016 a Truck bearing Registration No.HR38G-5557 was intercepted on NH-28 by the Assistant Commissioner (Incharge) Commercial Tax, Mobile Squad Unit, Padrauna, Kushinagar. Statement of the driver of the truck was recorded who stated that the goods in the truck have been loaded from Ghaziabad. He stated that he has TDF No.D201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entioned in the invoices accompanying the goods are invalid, consignors and consignees are not bonafide, consignors and consignees are non-existent hence respondent cannot prove that from whom delivery of goods have been taken and to whom it is to be dilivered and from whom freight is to be received, when contacted on phone numbers mentioned in certain invoices accompanying bilties it came to light that purchasers and their place of business is in Deoria (U.P.) which proves that goods are to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y information of any kind about the consignors and whosoever books the goods takes bilty and on place of destination the person who produces bilty, the goods are delivered to him. The goods do not relate to the State of U.P. 5. The reply submitted by the respondents was not found satisfactory. Consequently by order dated 25.10.2016, the goods (PARCHOON) valued at ₹ 9,45,600/- were seized and cash security @ 40% being ₹ 3,78,240/- was demanded for its release. 6. Aggrieved with the se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unal dated 29.11.2016 and the goods were directed to be released without security. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the applicants have filed the present revision. Submissions:- 8. Sri B.K. Pandey submits that the entire activity of the respondent is fraudulent. The goods originated from Ghaziabad and the same were being transported under the cover of forged invoices bearing fictitious TIN numbers, showing non-existent consignees. Addresses of consignees have not been mentioned in any of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted 13.12.2016 passed by this Court, requiring the applicant to clarify with some evidence that the goods were for delivery at Deoria, an affidavit of compliance was filed on 16.12.2016, after serving a copy thereof upon the respondent. Annexure 2 of the supplementary affidavit dated 16.12.2016 is the information obtained from authorities of B.S.N.L., Padruana, Kushinagar and Office of the Branch Manager of Vodafone, Kasya, Kushinagar by which they informed that the mobile numbers in question ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed as Annexure 3 to the affidavit. He further submits that at the time of checking of the packet of goods relating to bilty no.13672, it was found that it is mentioned on the packet itself that the goods are to be delivered at Deoria. He submits that the facts on record, clearly indicate fraudulent conduct of the respondent which shows intent to deceive the department to evade payment of tax by accompanying with the goods fake and fictitious papers and making a false declaration in the transit d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at despite service of the supplementary affidavit, the respondent could not courage to deny the facts stated therein. He also drawn attention of the Court to paragraph 6 of the notice at page 36 of the revision and submits that despite specific mention of facts with regard to mobile numbers mentioned in the invoices indicating intended unloading of the goods at Deoria, the respondent has not submitted any specific reply at any stage including his reply dated 22.10.2016 filed before the Mobile Sq .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned "Mairwa, Siwan, Bihar". He submits that since the goods were being transported by the respondent from outside the State of U.P. to outside the State of U.P. and therefore, the authorities under the U.P. VAT Act, have no jurisdiction to interfere with the movement of goods or to seize the goods and demand security. In support of his submissions, he refers to the provisions of Section 52 of the Act and relied the decisions of this Court in the case of Madhya Bharat Transport Carrier .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt in the case of Om Logistics Ltd. Vs. C.C.T. in STR 326 of 2011, has no application on the facts of the present case. He submits that merely on the basis of information in the matter of M/s Kumar Garments and certain information with regard to mobile numbers as filed along with supplementary affidavit, no adverse inference can be drawn with respect to the entire goods. He submits that the information obtained in the matter of M/s Kumar Garments was not part of show cause notice. Lastly he subm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or incidental to or in connection with business of a dealer, any officer authorized under sub-section (1) of section 45, for the purpose of investigation into tax liability of a dealer, subject to provision of sub-section (11) of section 45, may exercise powers under subsection (1) to sub-section (10) of the said section. EXPLANATION- For the purposes of this section, following persons shall be deemed to carry on activities ancillary or incidental to or in connection with the business of a deal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(1) An officer authorised under sub-section (1) of section 45 shall have the powers to seize any goods - (i) which are found in a dealer's place of business, vehicle, vessel or any other building or place; or (ii) which, such officer has reason to believe to belong to the dealer and which are found in any place of business, vehicle, vessel or any other building or place, but are not account for by the dealer in his accounts, registers or other documents maintained in the ordinary course of h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

list of all the goods seized under this sub-section shall be prepared by such officer and be signed by the officer and not less than two witnesses. (2) Where any officer referred to in sub-section (1) has reason to believe that the goods found in any vehicle, vessel, building or place are not traced to any bonafide dealer or documents issued by a bonafide dealer with respect to accompanying goods contains wrong particulars or that it is doubtful if such goods are properly accounted for by any d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authority concerned. (4) The said assessing authority shall serve on the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge of the goods at the time of seizure (hereinafter in this section referred to as the person in charge) a notice in writing requiring him to show cause, why a penalty should not be imposed. (5) If such authority, after taking into consideration the explanation, if any, of the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge and after giving him an opportunity of being he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d transaction had taken place, with intention to evade payment of tax, it shall pass an order imposing a penalty not exceeding forty per cent of the value of such goods, as he deems fit. (6) A copy of the order imposing penalty under sub-section (5) shall be served on the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge. (7) The officer seizing the goods shall serve on the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge an order in writing mentioning the fact of such seizure and indicatin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

osit or on depositing such lesser amount, or furnishing security in such form other than cash or indemnity bond, as he may deem fit: PROVIDED FURTHER that in case of a person, who is not a registered dealer and against whom penalty order referred to in sub-section (7) has been passed, filing of return by such person and assessment of tax on him may not be necessary. (8) The penalty or such part thereof as remains after adjustment of any amount deposited under sub-section (7) shall be deposited i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ments referred to in sub-section (3), or the assessing authority at any time thereafter, is of the opinion that the goods are subject to speedy and natural decay or where the tax assessed or penalty imposed, as the case may be, is not deposited in accordance with the provisions of this Act, the officer seizing the goods or the assessing authority, as the case may be, may, without prejudice to any other action that may be taken in accordance with other provisions of this Act, cause the goods to b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case may be, the person in-charge by the authority with whom it was so deposited, in accordance with the provisions of section 40." (Emphasis supplied by me) Section 52. Provision for goods passing through the state.- When a vehicle coming from any place outside the State and bound for any other place outside the State carrying goods referred to in sub-section (1) of section 50, passes through the State, the driver or other person in charge of such vehicle shall carry such documents as may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vehicle shall carry such documents and follow such procedures as may be determined by general or special order issued by the Commissioner from time to time, failing which it shall be presumed that the goods carried thereby are meant for sale within the State by the owner or person-in-charge of the vehicle. Rule 59. Import or receipt of goods by rail, river or air and matters incidental thereto. (1) A registered dealer or a person other than a registered dealer desirous of importing or receiving .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessing authority to whom a declaration or certificate is submitted for endorsement shall, after satisfying himself about their correctness and completeness, sign and stamp with his official seal, retain the original portion of the declaration or the certificate and return to the registered dealer or the person other than the registered dealer, as the case may be, the duplicate portion thereof after endorsing thereon a receipt for the retained original portion. The assessing authority may, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions in rule 54,and rule 56, except sub-rules (1), (6), (8) and (11) thereof and of rule 57 except subrule (1) and (6) thereof shall mutatis mutandis, apply in regard to the declaration or certificate, as the case maybe, referred to in sub-rule (1). (5) The commissioner may from time to time issue instructions with regard to the procedure to be followed regarding taking of delivery of goods and submission of declaration or certificate." Section 165 of Indian Evidence Act "165. The Judg .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the Judgment must be based upon facts declared by this Act to be relevant, and duly proved: Provided also that this section shall not authorize any Judge to compel any witness to answer any question, or to produce any document which such witness would be entitled to refuse to answer or produce under sections 121 to 131, both inclusive, if the questions were asked or the documents were called for by the adverse party; nor shall the Judge ask any question which it would be improper for any other .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2008 is valid? (ii) Whether Delhi - U.P. Border area of District Ghaziabad is "no-man's land"? (iii) Whether transporters are strangers to the transaction of sale and purchase and totally ignorant about the consignors and consignees? (iv) Whether fraudulent transportation of goods and colourable devices used to give impression of transportation of goods from outside the State of U.P. to outside the State of U.P. shall fall under Section 52 or would be a case falling under Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n any of the invoices except only one invoice of M/s Shakti Trading Company in favour of M/s Kumar Garments, and instead merely "MERWA" has been mentioned in the invoices. In some of the invoices found accompanying the goods, mobile numbers were noted just below the name of the alleged consignees. The Mobile Squad Authority made a call on these mobile numbers, which revealed that the recipient of the goods are of district Deoria (Uttat Pradesh). Despite specific mention of facts with r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vit of compliance was filed on 16.12.2016 by the applicants, after serving a copy thereof upon the respondent. Informations contained in the affidavit have not been denied by the respondents even after being asked by the court as evident from the order dated 19.12.2016. Annexure 2 of the supplementary affidavit dated 16.12.2016 are the letters of authorities of B.S.N.L., Padruana, Kushinagar and Office of the Branch Manager of Vodafone, Kasya, Kushinagar by which they informed that the mobile nu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lty no.13672, it was found that it is mentioned on the packet that the goods are to be delivered at Deoria. These evidences clearly indicate fraudulent conduct of the respondent with intent to deceive the department to evade payment of tax by accompanying with the goods fake and fictitious papers and making a false declaration in the transit declaration form, so as to give colour to the transportation of goods from Ghaziabad for sale within the State of U.P. as transportation from outside the St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to come forward. Specific queries were made by the Mobile Squad Authority based on documentary evidences regarding the invoices accompanying the goods to be fake, TIN numbers mentioned therein to be fictitious, intended unloading of goods at Deoria for sale and the alleged consignors to be non-existent, yet none of the alleged consignors/ owners of goods came forward nor the respondents disclosed identity of real consignors/ owners and consignees of the goods nor replied the queries made by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the cover of bogus invoices with fictitious TIN numbers printed thereon. Respondents downloaded TDF-1 by submitting false information, suppressing material information, identity and particulars of real owners of the goods, so as to give it colour of transportation of the goods from outside the State of Uttar Pradesh to outside the State of Uttar Pradesh under Section 52 of the Act, with intent to evade tax under the Act. Under the circumstances, seizure of the goods under Section 48 of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le. It is undisputed that District Ghaziabad is within the territory of State of U.P. Neither the Constitution of India nor any Statute provides for Delhi-U.P. Border area of District Ghaziabad to be "no man's land". The circular of the Commissioner Sales Tax dated 31.01.1987 was issued in view of Establishment of Check Posts under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. Section 49 of the U.P. VAT Act provides for establishment of check-posts and barriers but this provision has been omitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

apart, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 52 of the Act read with Rule 58 of the Rules, the Commissioner of Commercial Tax has issued a circular dated 03.09.2013 providing for the procedure for vehicles passing through the State which person incharge of the vehicle is bound to follow. Paragraph-6 of the aforesaid circular dated 03.09.2013 provides as under:- 16. The circular dated 31.01.1987 has been heavily relied by the respondents on the basis of certain judgments of this court co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o man's land" rather it is part of District Ghaziabad (U.P.). Question No. (iii) Whether transporters are strangers to the transaction of sale and purchase and totally ignorant about the consignors and consignees? 18. Before the authorities and the Tribunal, the respondents took the stand that they being transporter have no right to obtain information of any kind about any businessman rather the business of transportation is based on practical formula that whosoever books the goods for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

strangers to the sale or purchase of goods, to the contrary are part and parcel and are directly involved in storing the goods purchased or sold by dealers, and in many cases such transactions are fictitiously carried on in false names and addresses besides false classifications vis-a-vis transportation of such goods in and outside the State making themselves party to the episode of such fictitious transactions for the sole purpose of evasion of tax by the dealers purchasing and selling such go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

observed that where a transporter is stopped and it is found that consignee is fictitious and the goods are seized, it is not likely to effect the right of the transporter. In that eventuality, the consignor or the consignee should come forward and assign reasons for their concealing the real identity. The law does not help those who are torch bearers of dishonest persons. 21. In view of the above, it cannot be said that transporters are strangers to the transaction of purchases and sales and t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

porter is not affected if he is really a transporter. Therefore, instead of being torch bearer of dishonest persons, he should allow the real consignors or consignees to come forward and assign reasons for concealing their real identity. The action of the departmental authorities in such cases to unearth evasion of tax is one of their fundamental duties under the Act. Question No. (iv) Whether fraudulent transportation of goods and colourable devices used to give impression of transportation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ehalf of three other Judges, after referring to the observations of S.C. Shah, J. in CIT v. A. Raman and Co. AIR 1968 SC 49, CIT v. B. M. Kharwar (1969) 1 SCR 651, the judgments in Bank of Chettinad Ltd. v. CIT, (1940) 8 ITR 522, Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT, Bombay AIR 1959 SC 270; CIT v. Vadilal Lallubhai (1973) 3 SCC 17 and the views expressed by Viscount Simon in Latilla v. IRC, (1943) AC 377 : 25 TC 107 (HL) stated as follows: (McDowell and Co. Ltd. V. CTO, (1985) 3 SCC 230, SCC pp.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as only supplemented what Mishra, J. has stated on tax avoidance, therefore, we have to go by what Mishra, J. has spoken on tax avoidance. Reddy, J. has depreciated (sic deprecated) the practice of setting up of tax avoidance projects, in our view, rightly because the same is/was the situation in England and Ramsay (W.T.) Ltd. v. IRC, 1982 AC 300 and other judgments had depreciated the tax avoidance schemes. In our view, the ratio of the judgment is what is spoken by Mishra, J. for himself and o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xim which has never lost its temper overall these centuries. Lord Denning observed in a language without equivocation that "no judegment of a Court, no order of a Minister can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud, for fraud unravels everything"(Lazarus Estate Ltd. V. Beasley 1956(1)QB 702). (Emphasis supplied by me) 24. In the case of Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and others, 2003(8) SCC 319, Hon'ble Supreme Court defined fraud and considered the effect of frau .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is also well settled that misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud. Indeed, innocent misrepresentation may also give reason to claim relief against fraud. 18.A fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit and consists in leading a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on falsehood. It is a fraud in law if a party makes representations which he knows to be false, and injury ensues therefrom although the motive from which the representations proceeded may not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by L.Rs and others, AIR 1994 SC 853, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in para 7 as under : "7. The High Court, in our view, fell into patent error. The short question before the High Court was whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, Jagannath obtained the preliminary decree by playing fraud on the court. The High Court, however, went haywire and made observations which are wholly perverse. We do not agree with the High Court that "there is no legal duty cast upon the pla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs, bank-loan-dodgers and other unscrupulous persons from all walks of life find the court-process a convenient lever to retain the illegal-gains indefinitely. We have no hesitation to say that a person, who's case is based on falsehood, has no right to approach the court. He can be summarily thrown out at any stage of the litigation." (Emphasis supplied by me) 26. In the case of Jainendra Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2012 (8) SCC 748, Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the fact of appoin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd antecedents is one of the important criteria to test whether the selected candidate is suitable to the post under the State and on account of his antecedents the appointing authority if find not desirable to appoint a person to a disciplined force can it be said to be unwarranted. 29.3 When appointment was procured by a person on the basis of forged documents, it would amount to misrepresentation and fraud on the employer and, therefore, it would create no equity in his favour or any estoppel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acter/antecedents at the time of recruitment and suppression of such material information will have clear bearing on the character and antecedents of the candidate in relation to his continuity in service. 29.6 The person who suppressed the material information and/or gives false information cannot claim any right for appointment or continuity in service. 29.7 The standard expected of a person intended to serve in uniformed service is quite distinct from other services and, therefore, any delibe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

undesirable or unsuitable for the post. 29.9 An employee in the uniformed service pre-supposes a higher level of integrity as such a person is expected to uphold the law and on the contrary such a service born in deceit and subterfuge cannot be tolerated. 29.10The authorities entrusted with the responsibility of appointing Constables, are under duty to verify the antecedents of a candidate to find out whether he is suitable for the post of a Constable and so long as the candidate has not been a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o manner of doubt that the alleged invoices accompanying the goods are fake, the TIN numbers printed therein are fictitious, the alleged consignors are non-existent, the goods were to be unloaded/ delivered at Deoria (U.P.) and identity of real owners of the goods have been concealed by the respondents with the only motive to evade tax under the Act or to help undisclosed persons/ non-bonafide dealers to evade tax. It is a clear case of fraud, misrepresentation and suppression of facts by the re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w perpetuation of fraud by entertaining the technical pleas. The very foundation of the case of the respondent is based on falsehood and fraud. The respondents have suppressed material facts and did not disclose it despite being repeatedly asked by the Mobile Squad Authority. Even they abstained to answer the queries made by the court as afore-noted. They have not disclosed the real person/ owner of the goods in question. Wrong has been clearly committed and, therefore, the respondents cannot be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version