Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ITO, WARD 5 (2) , NEW DELHI Versus M/s KATHURIA CASTING (P) LTD. AND VICE-VERSA

Addition u/s. 68 - inguenity of loan - information from the Investigation Wing that the assessee has received accommodation entries - Held that:- There was only one loan taken by assessee from Moderate Credit Crop Ltd. by cheque no. 743431 & 743430 dated 18.08.2015 of ₹ 25 lacs each. The loan was repaid by cheque no. 230415 dated 28.04.2007 of ₹ 45 lacs and cheque no. 530345 dated 03.05.2007 of ₹ 5 lacs. Thus the loan was repaid 3 years before the date of statement taken by Inv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee company cannot be treated as a sham transaction. It of the opinion that this is a genuine loan transaction which has been repaid by the AO ₹ 50 lacs which was rightly been deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) which does not need any interference on my part, hence, uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. - Also find that Ld. CIT(A) further observed in his impugned order that the loan is taken from non-related parties/company M/s. Moderate Credit Corp. Ltd. He further observed tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/cs, and hence reduced the returned loss by this amount. Therefore, the observation of the Ld. CIT(A) that the net assessed loss after giving effect to this order will be Rs. (-) 15,15,832 + 3,50,000 = ₹ 11,65,832/-) is quite genuine and therefore, the addition made of ₹ 3,50,000/- by the Ld. CIT(A) is reasonable, hence, I upheld the same. - ITA No. 4313/Del/2014, CROSS OBJECTION NO. 218/Del/2016 - Dated:- 9-1-2017 - SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER FOR THE DEPARTMENT : SH. ANIL KUMA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T. Act, 1961 despite of having information from the Investigation Wing that the assessee has received accommodation entries worth of ₹ 50,00,000/-? 2. That the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous and is not tenable on facts and in law. 3. The ground of appeal are without prejudice to each other. 4. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or forgo any ground(s) of the appeal raised above at the time of hearing. 2. The grounds raised by the Assessee in the Cross Objection reads .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

out the support of any cogent material either collected or placed upon records, though it was not before the AO. 3. That the respondent company assails their right to amend, alter or change any grounds of appeal of any time even during the course of hearing of instant appeal. Prayer:- It is therefore, prayed that the order passed by the AO may please be quashed and also delete the estimated additions of ₹ 3.50 lacs as confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A). 3. The brief facts of the case are that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der dated 20.3.2014. 4. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order of the AO, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order dated 16.5.2014 deleted the addition and made the addition of ₹ 3,50,000/- on account of estimated interest paid and partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 5. Against the order of the learned CIT(A) the Revenue is in appeal and the Assessee has filed the Cross Objection before the Tribunal. 6. Ld. DR relied upon the order of the AO and reiterated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Ld. CIT(A) may be cancelled on this addition and appeal of the Revenue may be allowed accordingly. 7. On the contrary, the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee contended that the action of the AO was not justified. With regard to deletion of addition of ₹ 50 Lacs he stated that Ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the addition which does not need any interference on my part. However, with regard to Cross Objection is concerned, he stated that the addition of ₹ 3,50,000/- made by the Ld. Ld. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The ARs vehemently argued that there is no accommodation entry given by Sh. Aseem Kumar Gupta, CA to this appellant company in the past. There was only one loan taken by appellant on from Moderate Credit Crop Ltd. by cheque no. 743431 & 743430 dated 18.08.2015 of ₹ 25 lacs each. The loan was repaid by cheque no. 230415 dated 28.04.2007 of ₹ 45 lacs and cheque no. 530345 dated 03.05.2007 of ₹ 5 lacs. Thus the loan was repaid 3 years before the date of statement taken by inve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

such other transaction however happened with that company. The genuine transaction made by the appellant company cannot be treated as a sham transaction. I have discussed the matter with the ARs very carefully after going through the paper book evidences and return copy. I am of the opinion that this is a genuine loan transaction which has been repaid by the AO ₹ 50 lacs stands deleted. The loan is taken from non-related parties/company M/s. Moderate Credit Corp. Ltd. It is strange to beli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt company which was not shown in books of a/cs, and hence reduce the returned loss by this amount. The net assessed loss after giving effect to this order will be Rs. (-) 15,15,832 + 3,50,000 = ₹ 11,65,832/-). In the result, the appeal is partly allowed. 9. After perusing the aforesaid finding of the Ld. CIT(A), I find that there was only one loan taken by assessee from Moderate Credit Crop Ltd. by cheque no. 743431 & 743430 dated 18.08.2015 of ₹ 25 lacs each. The loan was repai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the bank account of M/s. Moderate Credit Corp. Ltd. before issuing cheque or no such other transaction however happened with that company. Hence, the genuine transaction made by the assessee company cannot be treated as a sham transaction. I am of the opinion that this is a genuine loan transaction which has been repaid by the AO ₹ 50 lacs which was rightly been deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) which does not need any interference on my part, hence, I uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version