GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (1) TMI 752 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2017 (1) TMI 752 - CESTAT BANGALORE - TMI - SSI exemption - export turnover not included in value of clearances - suppression of facts - time limitation - Held that: - the entire demand is time-barred. The period of dispute in the case is from July 2004 to December 2004 and the show-cause notice was issued in March 2007 which is much after the expiry of the period of limitation of one year. Moreover in the show-cause notice, extended period of limitation has not been invoked and there are no rea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Appellant Smt Ezhil Mathi, AR For the Respondent ORDER Per S. S. Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 29.11.2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal of the appellant and upheld the Order-in-Original. Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellant is a partnership firm and engaged in the manufacture of articles of Steel, Nuts and Screws of brass falling under Chapter 73 and 74 of the Central Excise Ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manded the differential duty of ₹ 3,89,640/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Eighty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Forty only) along with interest and also proposed penalty under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant refuted the allegation in the show-cause notice by submitting that SSI Exemption applies only to clearances made to home consumption and not for export. Exports turnover are excluded under the SSI Exemption Notification. The appellant denied the su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missioner and the Commissioner rejected the appeal and upheld the order of the Assistant Commissioner. Aggrieved by the said order, the present appeal has been filed. 2. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same is rendered in disregard of the binding judicial precedents. He further submitted that the entire demand itself is time-barred as the export took place between the period Ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Textile Mills 1997 (94) 481 (SC) wherein the Apex Court has held as follows: "...We have already mentioned that there was nothing in the show-cause notice dated February 7, 1983 to indicate that the conditions prescribed in the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act for invoking the extended period of limitation were present. In the circumstances, it must be held that the proceedings initiated against the respondent on the basis of the show-cause notice dated February 19, 1983 rel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as been granting rebate only after satisfying itself about the proof of export. He further submitted that the Appellate Commissioner has failed to enter finding as to how the export value is includible in the first clearances of ₹ 100 lakhs if the exports are effected on payment of duty under rebate claim. In support of his claim, the learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: (i) U.V. Laboratories Vs. CCE, Thane-II 2012 (276) E.L.T. 266 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ii) S.V. Mestry Engg. Works .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he differential duty. 5. After considering the submissions of both the parties, we find that in this case the entire demand is time-barred. The period of dispute in the case is from July 2004 to December 2004 and the show-cause notice was issued in March 2007 which is much after the expiry of the period of limitation of one year. Moreover in the show-cause notice, extended period of limitation has not been invoked and there are no reasons given in the show-cause notice for invoking the extended .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version