TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 871X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , after lodging this appeal on 2nd April, 2014, no steps were taken even after sufficient time was granted and additionally to the Revenue - Now, waking up after more than two and half years after such a dismissal and seeking restoration of the appeal would not be fair and proper. It is clear that there is no cause shown, much less some change in the panel of advocates. No details are provided and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mplying with all the procedural formalities and removing the objections. Therefore, by a conditional order, the appeal was dismissed for want of removal of office objections. Thereafter it appears that the appeal, which was otherwise also belated but the delay was condoned in filing it, remained without the office objections being complied with. This Court granting enough latitude, condoned the de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the Registry dismissed this appeal for want of compliance with procedural formalities after giving an opportunity to the Revenue to so comply with the same. Thus, after lodging this appeal on 2nd April, 2014, no steps were taken even after sufficient time was granted and additionally to the Revenue. 4. Now, waking up after more than two and half years after such a dismissal and seeking restor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... el advocates also do not have their own paraphernalia including clerks. We do not think that the High Court should condone such lapses and utter negligence on the part of the Revenue officials and their advocates. 6. In the circumstances, we hold that the delay of 776 days remains unexplained. The cause shown is not bona fide and reasonable. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prose ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
