Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus MAHAVIR INDUCTOMELT PVT. LTD.

Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Held that:- As the assessee was not share holder of Mahavir Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd to whom loan was given, it cannot be said that the learned Tribunal has committed any error in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on deemed dividend. - Decided in favour of assessee - TAX APPEAL NO. 891 of 2016 - Dated:- 12-1-2017 - MR. M.R. SHAH AND MR. B.N. KARIA, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Mahavir Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd and no addition could be made u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act, as deemed dividend ? 2.0. The facts leading to the present Tax Appeal in nutshell are as under: 2.1. That the assessee company is engaged in the business of Ship Breaking filed its return of income for AY 200708 declaring total income at ₹ 47,11,510/. The Assessing Officer completed the scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act by making addition of ₹ 14,02,522/on account of ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2.3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned CIT(A) in deleting the addition made on account of deemed dividend, the Revenue preferred appeal before the learned Tribunal. By impugned judgment and order, the learned Tribunal has dismissed said appeal preferred by the revenue and has confirmed the order passed by the learned CIT(A) deleting the addition made on account of deemed dividend. 2.4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned judgment and order pass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i K.K. Bansal who was one of the Director of the company having substantial holding in the company and the assessee has paid interest to the said Shri K.K. Bansal of ₹ 17,55,132/, the learned Assessing Officer rightly made the addition on account of deemed dividend. It is submitted that therefore, the learned Tribunal has materially erred in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer made on account of deemed dividend. Shri Manish Bhatt, learned counsel for the Revenue has heavily .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er was not justified in making the addition of the interest treating as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. 5.0. Identical question came to be considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Tax Appeal No. 253 of 2015. After considering the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Impact Containers Private Limited & ors rendered in ITA No. 114 of 2012 and the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Ankitech Pvt Ltd reported in 340 ITR 14 (Del) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version