Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Raigad Versus M/s. Shree Venkatesh Steel Ltd, Raigad

CENVAT credit - Bars and Rods of non alloy steel - denial on the ground that the goods manufactured by the Respondent being notified goods in terms of Section 3A of Central Excise Act, 1944, the respondent should pay duty under Section 3A of Central .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIGAD [2005 (12) TMI 404 - CESTAT, MUMBAI] where it was held that since the respondent is producing predominantly non notified goods, they are entitled to discharge duty liability for the entire quantity of goods under the norma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nst Revenue. - E/3906/05 - A/85075/17/EB - Dated:- 21-1-2017 - Mr Ramesh Nair, Member(Judicial) And Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member(Technical) Shri. Hitesh Shah, Commissioner(A.R.) for the Appellants Shri. Balu Mutke, Consultant for the Respondent Per : Rame .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the respondent is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely Bars and Rods of non alloy steel falling under chapter 7214.90 and Bars and Rods of other alloy steel falling under Chapter 72. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itle for modvat credit. The claim of the respondent before the adjudicating authority was that since they manufactured more than 50% non notified goods, they are not required to pay duty in terms of Section 3A. The present appeal of revenue is on the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for exemption notification No.214/86-C.E. 3. Shri Balu Mutke Ld. Consultant appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted a letter from the Respondent according to which the respondent had also filed an appeal before this Tribunal which was allowed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Updates     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version