Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Rank computers Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO 7 (2) (1) , Mumbai

Unaccounted sales - difference in party wise details of receipts and TDS made vis a vis the receipts shown in the profit and loss account - Held that:- As could be seen from the assessment stage itself the assessee has tried to explain the difference between the receipts as per TDS certificate and as per profit and loss account by explaining that the difference was due to 4% VAT element. In fact, we have noticed from the facts and material placed before us,the assessee has submitted before the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the file of the assessing officer for fresh examination after carefully considering the materials brought on record by the assessee for reconciling the difference. - Addition u/s 40 A (2) (b) - Held that:- As could be seen out of five years for which payment of royalty was to be made by the assessee, except the impugned assessment year, in no other assessment year assessee’s claim has been disallowed, though, assessments have been completed u/s 143 (3) of the Act. Therefore, applying the ru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e - Held that:-Assessee has brought material on record to demonstrate that it has brought on hire computers and peripherals from third parties and deduction claimed was on account of payment made to those parties towards hire charges. This fact is demonstrated from the TDS certificate submitted by the assessee before the departmental authorities. It is also a fact on record that assessee has deducted tax at source on payment of hire charges in terms of Section 194J of Act. Thus, prima facie it i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

46A we are not convinced with the same. It is evident on record that the TDS certificate on the basis of which Ld. CIT (A) has come to his conclusion were available before the assessing officer and in any case of the matter the TDS certificate cannot be treated as additional evidence. No infirmity in the order of the CIT (A) on this issue. Accordingly, we uphold the same by dismissing the grounds raised by the department. - ITA no.193/Mum./2015, ITA no.7613/Mum./2011 - Dated:- 10-2-2017 - SHRI S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the business of trading and giving on hire IT equipments like PC s, Laptop, servers, projectors etc. During the assessment proceeding the assessing officer while examining the party wise details of receipts and TDS made vis a vis the receipts shown in the proft and loss account found a difference of ₹ 6,65,330/-. On being asked by the assessing officer to reconcile the difference, the assessee submitted party wise list of gross receipts as per TDS certificate and as appearing in the pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Accordingly, he added back the amount of ₹ 6,65,330/-. Assessee challenged the addition before the CIT(A). However, Ld. CIT(A) also confirmed the addition by agreeing with the reasoning of the AO. 2. The Ld. AR submitted before us, the assessee in course of the assessment proceeding itself and again before the CIT (A) has not only explained the reason for difference in receipts but also furnished all necessary and relevant details reconciling the difference. In this context the Ld. AR dr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itted by the assesse and without appreciating the material brought on record have made the addition. 3. The Ld. DR though, relied upon the observations of the assessing officer and CIT (A), however, he submitted that the issue can be remitted back to the assessing officer for re-examination. 4. We have heard the parties and perused the material on record. As could be seen from the assessment stage itself the assessee has tried to explain the difference between the receipts as per TDS certificate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he details. That being the case, in our view, the departmental authorities should have examined assessee s claim by properly verifying the details submitted by the assessee. The departmental authorities having failed to do so, we are inclined to remit the issue back to the file of the assessing officer for fresh examination after carefully considering the materials brought on record by the assessee for reconciling the difference. The assessing officer must afford a reasonable opportunity of bein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee has debited an amount of ₹ 9,99,984/- towards royalty paid to directors. When the assessing officer called upon the assessee to justify the claim of deduction, the assesses in its explanation submitted that both the directors were having their proprietary business of hiring computers and peripherals. Both the directors decided to merge their proprietary business with the assessee company in order to conclude business, improve synergies and get better scales of economy. It was submitte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s were submitted by the assessee to indicate that directors were instrumental in bringing business. The assessing officer observed, since the payment were made to related parties provisions of section 40A (2)(b) is applicable. Accordingly, he proceeded to disallow the deduction claimed by the assessee. Assessee challenged the disallowance before the CIT (A). The CIT (A) appreciating the fact that the directors have merged their proprietary concern with the company and the royalty paid was in ter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s issue was first examined in the first year of claim of deduction viz. A.Y 2007-08, wherein, the assessing officer called upon the assessee to justify the claim of payment of royalty. He submitted, in reply assessee had justified claim by furnishing necessary details. The Ld. AR submitted, the assessing officer after examining the assessee s claim in detail allowed the payment of royalty. He submitted except the impugned assessment year, in no other assessment year the assessing officer has dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessing officer to indicate that payment made by the assessee is unreasonable. He therefore submitted, disallowance was rightly deleted by the CIT (A). 6. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the materials on record. The fact that the directors of the company were running their proprietary business in the same line has not been controverted by the assessing officer. He has not disputed the fact that the directors have merged their proprietary business with the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as allowed assessee s claim of deduction on account of payment of royalty. Thus, as could be seen out of five years for which payment of royalty was to be made by the assessee, except the impugned assessment year, in no other assessment year assessee s claim has been disallowed, though, assessments have been completed u/s 143 (3) of the Act. Therefore, applying the rule of consistency no disallowance should have been made in the impugned assessment year. Further, on perusal of the assessment ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment proceedings the assessing officer noticing that assessee has debited an amount of ₹ 45,67,901/- towards purchase of leased assets called for necessary detail and after verifying them found that the assessed has offered revenue from trading activity at ₹ 22,11,851/- and from hiring activity at of ₹ 1,63,72,661/-. From the aforesaid figures he found that major part of revenue is generated from hiring activity. Whereas, assessee has debited an amount of ₹ 73,65,319/- to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, did not find merit in the submission of the assessee. He observed, there is no reason why purchase cost of assets given on hiring activity should not be capitalized. Further, he observed, since the assessee has paid VAT at 4% on the purchases the claim that they are for hiring of equipment is not acceptable. Accordingly, he held that the expenditure claimed is not allowable. Further, he observed that if assessee s claim of hire charges is accepted then he should have deducted tax u/s 194 I. Si .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

so deducted tax at source on such payments u/s 194J held that the assessing officer was not justified in disallowing assessee s claim. Accordingly, he deleted the addition. 7. The Ld. DR relied upon the reasoning of the assessing officer. Ld. AR supported the finding of the CIT (A). 8. We have considered the submission of the parties and perused the materials on record. As could be seen, the assessing officer being of the view that the payments made by the assessee were towards purchase of asset .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version