GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (2) TMI 701 - KERALA HIGH COURT

2017 (2) TMI 701 - KERALA HIGH COURT - TMI - Extension of time for payment of fine - dishonor of cheque - petitioner submitted that though he could not deposit the fine amount within the time stipulated he intends to make the deposit but that the Court below is not accepting the said amount on the ground that the time granted by this Court had already expired - Held that:- Considering the pleas made by the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the time for payment of the fine amount could b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all further coercive steps including issuance of warrant if any, in pursuance of the execution of the sentence in this case will stand under suspension. The learned Public Prosecutor will convey these directions the competent police authorities for necessary compliance. - Crl.M.C. No.199 of 2017 - Dated:- 11-1-2017 - ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. FOR THE PETITIONER : ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH FOR THE RESPONDENT : ADV. SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ORDER The petitioner has been convicted for the offe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ows: The revision petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.108 of 2005 on the files of the court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Hosdurg. 2. The trial court convicted the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her thereunder to simple imprisonment for six months and to pay an amount of ₹1,00,000/- to the complainant as compensation under Section 357 (3) Cr.P.C. The appeal filed against the said conviction and sentence was dismissed. A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the revision petitioner. However, the revision petitioner did not make payment of the cheque amount within the statutory period or thereafter. 5. Before the court below, PW1 was examined and Exts.P1 to P5 were marked for the complainant. DW1 was examined and Ext.D1 was marked for the revision petitioner. 6. The courts below, after evaluating the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the parties, concurrently found that the revision petitioner executed Ext.P1 cheque as contemplated under Sec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the offence under Section 138 of N.I Act does not warrant any interference by this court. 7. As regards the sentence, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has pleaded for leniency. The cheque is for an amount of 1,00,000/-. Considering ₹ the facts and circumstances of the case, including the amount covered by Ext.P1 cheque, I am of the view that the sentence awarded by the courts below can be modified and reduced to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of 1,00 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n default of payment of fine, the revision petitioner shall undergo simple imprisonment for two months. (iv) in the event of realisation of fine, the entire amount shall be given to the complainant as compensation under Section 357 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. The revision petitioner is granted six months time to pay the fine as requested by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. The petitioner has filed the aforecaptioned Crl.M.C. With the following prayers: (i) To recall the arrest warrant aga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to directions issued in Crl.R.P.No.1847/2009 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala. 3. Heard Sri.C.K.Sreejith, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Saiji Jacob Palatty, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the 2nd respondent State of Kerala. In the nature of the reliefs sought for granting this petition, notice to R-1 (complainant) stands dispensed with. It is submitted by Sri.C.K.Sreejith, the learned Counsel for the petitioner that though the petitoner could n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version