GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (4) TMI 781 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2017 (4) TMI 781 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Imposition of penalties u/s 114(iii) of the CA, 1962 - valuation - T-Shirts and ladies night gowns - Revenue's case is that there was surreptitious clearance for exports and the three individuals, who are respondents in this appeal, were responsible officers of the customs department and they have allowed the consignments to be cleared without conducting proper checking - Held that: - There is nothing in the statements which indicates that these officers .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n be imposed on them u/s 114(iii) CA, 1962 - appeal rejected - decided against Revenue. - C/1221/2006 - A/86314/17/CB - Dated:- 19-1-2017 - Shri M V Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri S J Sahu, Superintendent (AR) for the appellant None for the respondent Per: M V Ravindran This appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Original CAO No: 88/2005/CAC/CC/NRN dated 30/09/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (E.P.), Mumbai. 2. None appeared on behalf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dies night gowns claiming drawback on the said shipping bills. It is claimed by the Revenue in the show cause notice that those goods were overvalued. Investigation was carried out and show cause notices were issued. During the course of investigation the individuals, who are respondents in these appeals, were also subjected to recording of statements as to the clearance of T-shirts covered under the various shipping bills. Subsequently, an addendum/corrigendum to the show cause notice was issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndents in this appeal. 4. It is the case of the Revenue in this appeal memorandum that these three people need to be penalized. 5. Learned Authorised Representatives takes us through the show cause notice dated 10th June 2003 and also corrigendum issued on 12th July 2004 and submits that the original show-cause notice dated 10th June 2003 had clearly brought on record that there was surreptitious clearance for exports and the three individuals, who are respondents in this appeal, were responsibl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g on record further three shipping bills which were not covered under the original show cause notice. 6. Considered the submissions made by the learned AR and perused the records. 7. On perusal of the first show cause notice dated 10th June 2003 we find, though the show-cause notice records that the statements were recorded of these three individuals (who are respondents herein), were officers of customs, there is no allegations in the said show-cause notice seeking any explanation from the resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ply from these officers nor they were charged for imposition of penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The addendum dated 12th July 2014 which is issued to the three officers herein needs to be reproduced and reads as under. In the Show Cause Notice of even number dated 10.6.2003 issued under section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the above subject, after Para 20, the following para shall be inserted: 20(A). Shri A.K. Choudhary, the then Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Shri K.K. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iscation under Section 113(d) and 113(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 8. It can be seen from the above reproduced addendum that the said addendum sought explanation from the respondents herein as to the surreptitious clearance of shipping bills Nos.5227082, 5227084 and 5227085. The adjudicating authority has specifically recorded that the show cause notice had called upon the officers to explain their conduct in respect of only these three shipping bills and on factual verification of the documents .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version