Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle-2 (1) , Guntur Versus M/s. Bommidala Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. And ACIT, Circle-1 (1) , Guntur Versus M/s. Bommidala Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. And Vice-Versa

Disallowance of exemption u/s 10AA - Held that:- Profit derived from the units situated at SEZ, engaged in the business of trading activity in the nature of import and re-export of goods falls within the definition of the term ‘services’ as defined in section 10AA of the Act. Consequently, the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, towards export profit derived from eligible unit located at SEZ. The CIT(A), after considering the relevant provisions of the Act, has rightly delete .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing income in the earlier years. The conditions prescribed u/s 36(1)(vii) and 36(2) of the Act has been fulfilled. Therefore, we are of the view that merely because assessee had not obtained approval of RBI to write off debts pertaining to foreign party, the claim of the assessee could not be disallowed. The CIT(A) after considering the relevant provisions of the Act and also relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Limited Vs. CIT (2010 (2) TMI 211 - SUPREME COURT ), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

41,583/-. We further observed that the assessee has achieved an export turnover of over ₹ 100 crores. We further observed that the transaction entered into by the assessee with its bankers is not in the nature of speculative transaction as defined u/s 43(5)(d) of the Act. Therefore, we are of the view that any loss incurred on forward contracts entered with its bankers to hedge the export receivables, in order to safeguard against price fluctuations in realization of trade debtors is in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evidences with regard to paid and payable. Therefore, we set aside the issue to the file of the A.O. and direct the A.O. to examine the issue with reference to the books of accounts of the assessee to ascertain the fact of paid and payable and if expenditure is paid within the same financial year, then the A.O. is directed to delete additions made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In other words, the A.O. is directed to restrict disallowance to the extent amount remaining payable at the end of the finan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Income Tax (A), Guntur for the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2009-10 & 2010-11. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Private Limited company, which is engaged in the business of processing and export of tobacco, filed its return of income for the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2009-10 & 2010-11 u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion u/s 10AA of the Act, and examination of bad debts written off by the assessee in the case of debts received from out of exports sales. Consequent to directions of the CIT u/s 263 of the Act, the A.O. has passed assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act, on the directions of the CIT u/s 263 of the Act and disallowed exemption claimed u/s 10AA of the Act, towards export profit derived from the unit situated at Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and disallowed bad debts written off towards deb .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3) of the Act and the A.O. has disallowed exemption claimed u/s 10AA of the Act, towards export profit derived from unit situated at SEZ. For the assessment year 2010-11, the A.O. also disallowed clearing and forwarding charges u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 194C of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the assessment orders, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee has filed elaborate written submissions in respect of each addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itions made by the A.O. towards disallowance of loss on forward exchange contracts. However, the CIT(A) partly allowed ground raised towards disallowance of expenditure made by the A.O., u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Aggrieved by the CIT(A) order, the revenue as well as the assessee are in appeal before us. 5. The revenue has raised common grounds for all the assessment years. From these grounds of appeals, the revenue has agitated 3 issues. (i) Disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10AA of the Act, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ame up for our consideration is disallowance of exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, towards export profit derived from SEZ unit. The fact which leads to disallowance of exemption u/s 10AA of the Act are that the assessee is having a unit at Cochin SEZ. The unit was approved from the Development Commissioner, Cochin SEZ, Cochin, vide letter no.9/05/2005/IL/CSEZ/1563 dated 14.3.2005. The unit situated at Cochin SEZ is engaged in the business of import of Cigars, Cigaretts, Alcoholic Beverages, re-expor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red any service so as to be eligible for exemption u/s 10AA of the Act. According to the A.O., the eligible units situated at SEZ, engaged in the business of manufacture or production of articles or things or provided any service only qualifies for exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, but not the units engaged in the business of trading activity. 7. The Ld. D.R. submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the fact that, the assessee neither engaged in any manufacturing activity nor providing an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

confirmed the order passed by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act, on the same issue, wherein the CIT has directed the A.O. to disallow exemption claimed u/s 10AA of the Act. The D.R. further submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) was erred in relied upon decision of the Hon ble Kerala High Court, in the case of Girnar Industries Vs. CIT (230 ITR 401) to consider the trading activity carried on by the SEZ unit has to be considered as Services as defined u/s 10AA of the Act, though the facts of the present case ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ture has ambiguously referred section 2 of the SEZ Act, 2005 for the purpose of defining manufacture, SEZ and unit, however, consciously no such reference is made with regard to definition of services so as to include import for export as contended by the assessee. Thus, the definition of service as per SEZ Act, cannot be imported for the purpose of section 10AA of the Act. Since, the assessee is not engaged in the business of manufacture or rendered any services, the A.O. has rightly disallowed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

years will be allowed beginning from the year in which the unit begins to manufacture or produce articles or provide any services. Though the meaning of the term services is not defined in the section, the definition provided under the relevant Act has to be considered for the purpose of section 10AA of the Act. The term services has been defined by the SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, 2006 under which Rule 76 of SEZ Rules, 2006 defines the term services , which includes trading. As per explanation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his arguments, relied upon the decision of ITAT, Visakhapatnam in ITA No.331/Vizag/2011 for the assessment year 2008-09 and submitted that the ITAT, after considering the provisions of section 10AA of the Act, the provisions of SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, 2006 and also by relied upon the decision of Hon ble Kerala High Court, in the case of Girnar Industries Vs. CIT 230 CTR 401, held that profits derived from the units situated at SEZ, engaged in the business of trading would come within the de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uestion arises for our consideration is whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the benefit of exemption u/s 10AA of the Act is available to the assessee, which is engaged in the business of trading activity in the nature of import and re-export of goods which falls within the meaning of the term services as defined u/s 10AA of the Act. Admittedly, the assessee has established a unit at Cochin SEZ, which was approved by the Development Commissioner vide his letter no.9/05/2005 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in SEZ Rules, 2006, the expression trading for the purpose of second schedule of SEZ Act, shall mean import for the purpose of re-export and such trading is included in the list of services for the purpose of section (2) of SEZ Act. The term services is not defined u/s 10AA of the Act. Since, the term services has not been defined u/s 10AA of the Act, the definition provided under the relevant Act, has to be considered for the purpose of the term services used in the section 10AA of the Act, for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

services as defined u/s (2) of SEZ Act, 2005 and Rule 76 of SEZ Rules, 2006, held that the activity carried on by the assessee amounts to rendering of services in importing and re-exporting of goods as defined under SEZ Rules, 2006. The relevant portion of the order is extracted below: 5. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We have heard the Ld. Departmental Representative in this regard and carefully perused the record. As per the SEZ rules, admittedly the activity carried on by the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der passed by the Ld. CIT(A) is based on cogent reasons in the light of the explanation given in SEZ rules as well as the definition contained in SEZ Act, 2005 and facts being identical in the earlier years, which was accepted by the assessing officer, in order to deviate from the decision taken in the earlier years, the burden is upon the A.O. to show that the view taken by him is the only view possible in the matter and, in law assessee cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be entitled to cla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of ITAT, Jaipur B Bench in the case of DCIT Vs. Goenka Diamonds & Jewellers Ltd. 509/JP/2011 dated 31.1.2012, wherein the coordinate bench of this Tribunal, under similar circumstances has held as under: We have also reproduced Section 51 of the SEZ Act. As per this Section, it is mentioned that notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act, the provision of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r of doubt that the provision of Special Court Act wherever they are applicable shall prevail over the provisionof the Income tax Act. The Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Vasisth Chay Vaapar Ltd., 330 ITR 440 held that when there is a provision in another enactment which contains a non obstente clause than that would override the provisions of the Income Tax. Thus one will have to consider the implication of Section 51 of the SEZ Act. It means that anything in-consistent to the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his case and also following the ratios of the judgements discussed above, we are of the view that profit derived from the units situated at SEZ, engaged in the business of trading activity in the nature of import and re-export of goods falls within the definition of the term services as defined in section 10AA of the Act. Consequently, the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, towards export profit derived from eligible unit located at SEZ. The CIT(A), after considering the rel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat debts written off in the books of accounts of the assessee are arised out of export turnover, which can be written off in accordance with the guidelines issued by the RBI, whereas the assessee has written off these bad debts in contravention of the provisions of RBI guidelines, therefore, opined that bad debt written off is not allowable deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) of the Act. It is the contention of the assessee that in order to claim deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) of the Act, it is not necessary fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

able. The Act does not differentiate between domestic debt and foreign debt and if such a bad debt is written off in the books of accounts as irrecoverable whether it is on account of receivables from domestic sales or non-realisation of export proceeds, then the assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) of the Act. In support of his arguments, relied upon the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Limited Vs. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 397. 14. Having heard both the parties and co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ourse of export turnover cannot be written off unilaterally. The A.O. referred to the RBI guidelines and also the provisions of section 41(1) of the Act. In the case of domestic debts, where the domestic debt is unilaterally written off, the department had jurisdiction over other party to bring him under the provisions of Income Tax Act by way of section 41(1) of the Act. Whereas, in the case of debts arising out of non-realisation export proceeds written off unilaterally, the department cannot .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

become irrecoverable. It is enough if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee and amount has been offered as income in computing the income in earlier years fulfilling the conditions laid down in sub section (2) of section 36 of the Act, as held by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Limited Vs. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 397 (SC). We further observed that the Act does not make any difference between debts arised in the course of domestic business and debts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ncome in computing income in the earlier years. The conditions prescribed u/s 36(1)(vii) and 36(2) of the Act has been fulfilled. Therefore, we are of the view that merely because assessee had not obtained approval of RBI to write off debts pertaining to foreign party, the claim of the assessee could not be disallowed. The CIT(A) after considering the relevant provisions of the Act and also relied upon the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Limited Vs. CIT (supra), has rightly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

transaction, which cannot be allowed as deduction against business income. According to the A.O., as per the provisions of section 43(5) of the Act, only eligible transactions which are not in the nature of speculative transaction as defined u/s 43(5) of the Act, only qualify for deduction. The A.O. referred to the CBDT circular and observed that any eligible transaction in respect of trading in derivatives referred to in clause (ac) of section (2) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation Act, 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of settlement of hedging transactions is treated as revenue expenditure. The assessee further contended that during the financial year relevant to assessment year 2009-10, its export turnover is more than the value of forward exchange contracts, therefore, any loss suffered on forward exchange contracts not in the nature of speculative transactions is allowable as deduction against business income. 17. Having heard both the parties and considered materials on record, we find that the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the nature of speculative transaction as defined u/s 43(5)(d) of the Act. Therefore, we are of the view that any loss incurred on forward contracts entered with its bankers to hedge the export receivables, in order to safeguard against price fluctuations in realization of trade debtors is in the nature of business loss, but not speculation loss as defined u/s 43(5)(d) of the Act. The CIT(A) after considering the relevant details has rightly deleted additions made by the A.O. We do not find any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or failure to deduct TDS u/s 194C of the Act. It is the contention of the assessee that expenditure incurred under the head export clearing charges is in the nature of reimbursement of expenses incurred by the parties, for which the provisions of section 194C of the Act has no application. The assessee further submitted that export clearing charges and import clearing charges consist of payment towards custom duty; ocean freight, local transport charges, terminal handling charges, which was incu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ounts has been paid within the same financial year. In support of its arguments, relied upon the decision of ITAT, Visakhapatnam special bench decision in the case of Merilyn Shipping & Transporters Vs. ACIT (2012) 136 ITD 23. 19. Having heard both the parties and considered material on record, we find that the A.O. has disallowed clearing and forwarding charges u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, for failure to deduct TDS u/s 194C of the Act. It is the contention of the assessee that expenditure incu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iture specified under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, for non-deduction of tax at source under respective provisions. The coordinate bench held that no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, if amounts have been paid on or before 31st March of the financial year. Therefore, we are of the view that the A.O. was not correct in disallowing expenditure incurred under the head clearing and forwarding charges under the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, for non-deduction of tax at s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on ble A.P. High Court, in the case of Janapriya Engineering Syndicate (supra) decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The relevant portion of the order is extracted as under: We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the record. Consistent with the view taken by the ITAT Special Bench Visakhapatnam and also in the light of the view expressed by the Hon ble A.P. High Court in the case of Janapriya Engineering Syndicate, we are of the opinion that the provisions of secti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een paid on or before the end of the financial year. However, the assessee has failed to file necessary evidences with regard to paid and payable. Therefore, we set aside the issue to the file of the A.O. and direct the A.O. to examine the issue with reference to the books of accounts of the assessee to ascertain the fact of paid and payable and if expenditure is paid within the same financial year, then the A.O. is directed to delete additions made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In other words, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Notification: Absolute Exemption from IGST on inter-State supplies of goods

Notification: CGST Rate Schedule u/s 9(1) - notifying rates of CGST @ 2.5%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 1.5% and 0.125% on Supply of Goods

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Forum: REGISTRETION

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version