GST Helpdesk   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
GST - Acts SGST - Acts GST - FAQ GST Rates, Exemption CGST Notif. IGST Notif. Exempt Income Salary income
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (4) TMI 941 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2017 (4) TMI 941 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI - Imposition of penalty - case of appellant is that appellant had paid the entire service tax alongwith interest in regard to BAS services even before issuance of SCN - Held that: - Appellant has paid service tax of ₹ 3,56,681/- alongwith interest in regard to GTA service prior to issuance of SCN. A small amount of ₹ 1,38,050/- stands unpaid with regard to GTA services. Therefore, the confirmation of entire demand and equal penalty imposed on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i, Member(Judicial) Shri V.J. Sankaram, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri Nagraj Naik, Dy. Commissioner/AR for the Respondent. [Order per: Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of photovoltaic cell modules and systems and are registered with Central Excise Department. They are also receiving services of transport of goods by road (GTA) and are registered under the category of Erection and Commissioning service. On receipt of information that appellants are not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vices and ₹ 10,04,379/- under the category of BAS. The appellants had already paid an amount of ₹ 3,56,681/- towards GTA services and the entire amount of ₹ 10,04,379/- towards BAS services even before the issuance of Show Cause Notice. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand of service tax of ₹ 4,84,731/- under GTA services and appropriated the amount of ₹ 3,56,681/- paid by appellant towards the said demand. An amount of ₹ 10,04 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rein, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence this appeal. 3. On behalf of the appellant, Ld. Counsel Shri V.J. Sankaram submitted that the appellant is not contesting the taxability of the services and is confining the challenge only on the penalty imposed. He submitted that appellant had paid the entire service tax alongwith interest in regard to BAS services even before issuance of show cause notice. As regards GTA services, an amount of ₹ 3,56,681/- was paid by the appellant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version