GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (4) TMI 944 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2017 (4) TMI 944 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - TMI - Maintainability of appeal - alternative remedy - dismissal on the ground that the order assailed in the writ petition was appealable order and there was alternative remedy under the CEA, 1944 - Held that: - we cannot intervene on a point not specifically pleaded before us, on the basis of oral submission of the learned counsel on procedural issues, arising subsequent to delivery of the judgement by the learned First Court - We do not find any purpos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ground that the order assailed in the writ petition was appealable order and there was alternative remedy under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The writ petitioner is primarily aggrieved by an order passed in an adjudication proceeding on 26th February, 2016 in which the adjudicating authority inter alia held:- i. I confirm the demand of Central Excise duty of an amount ₹ 3,52,99,354/- (Rupees Three Crore Fifty-two lakh Ninety-nine thousand Three hundred Fifty-four only) and order recovery .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Act, 1944. iv. I confirm the demand of Customs duty of amount ₹ 6,24,07,996 (Rupees Six crore Twenty four lakh Seven thousand Nine hundred Ninety-six only) and order recovery of the same from M/s Sova Power Ltd. in terms of Section 28(2) of Customs Act, 1962 as amended from time to time. v. I impose interest at appropriate rate under provision of Section 28AB of Customs Act, 1962 (Section 28AA wherever applicable). vi. I impose Penalty of ₹ 6,24,07,996/- (Rupees Six crore Twenty-fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Department of Revenue of Finance, Government of India, could not be considered. The judgement of the learned First Court was delivered on 15th July, 2007. Mr. Dhar s contention is that if the circular was taken into account, the demand and the finding of the learned Adjudicating authority would stand invalidated. This circular has been brought to our notice by way of filing a supplementary affidavit, for which leave has been granted by us. We do not find any shot coming in the reasoning of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version