Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle 17 (2) , Hyderabad Versus M/s. Virtusa India P. Ltd.

TPA - comparable selection - Held that:- Assessee is engaged in providing software development services. The assessee has two software development centers in Chennai and Hyderabad, both of which are registered under the STPI scheme of Government of India as 100% export oriented units, thus companies dissimilar with that of assessee need to be deselected from final list of comparable. - Since the information considered by the A.O. said to be belonging to e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., and the in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion, even then, such company cannot be taken as a comparable to an assessee. The A.O./TPO shall take into consideration such judicial precedents before taking a decision about the comparability of e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., with the assessee company. Accordingly, assessee’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes. - Infosys Technology Ltd., be excluded from the list of comparables on account of functional dissimilarity and owning of significant intangibles and brand va .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the above are cross-appeals of the Assessee as well as the Revenue for the A.Y. 2010-2011 against the assessment order dated 09.02.2015 passed by the A.O. under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company, which is wholly owned subsidiary of Virtusa Corporation, USA (with 99.99% shareholding) is engaged in providing software development services primarily to it s A.E. The assessee has two software development centers in Ch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

axpayer i.e., the assessee herein for the F.Y. 2009-2010 were as under : Description Amount ( in Rs.) Operating Revenue 196,98,88,305 Operating Cost 172,58,21,043 Operating Profit 24,40,67,262 OP/OR (%) 13.39 Op/OC (%) 14.14 Before the TPO, the assessee submitted that for the software development services, after applying certain filters, the assessee company has shortlisted 21 companies as comparables whose arithmetic mean/PLI (OP/OC) is computed at 11.26% as against the PLI of the assessee at 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s Sl. No. Name of the Company 1. Accelya Kale Solutions Ltd., 2. Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd., 3. CAT Technologies Ltd., 4. Comp-U-Learn Tech India Ltd., 5. e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., 6. Evok Tech 7. E-Zest Solutions Ltd., 8. Infosys Technology Ltd., 9. Kals Information Systems Ltd., (Seg.) 10. Kuliza Tech 11. L & T Infotech Ltd., 12. Mindtree Ltd., (Seg.) 13. Persistent Systems & Solutions Ltd., (Merged) 14. R S Software (India) Ltd., 15. Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd., 16. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the shortfall of ₹ 13,05,57,916 under section 92CA of the Act. 2.3. Based on the T.P. order, the A.O. passed the draft assessment order and forwarded the same to the assessee for its objections, if any. The assessee filed its objections before the DRP. The DRP directed the A.O. to exclude the following companies from the list of companies viz., (1) Infosys Technologies Ltd., (2) L & T Infotech Ltd., and (3) Tata Elexi Ltd., Against the assessee s objections to the inclusion of cert .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the comparables selected by the TPO which have been accepted by the assessee and also the comparables which are being challenged by the assessee as well as the Revenue and is also seeking the inclusion of certain companies as comparables which have been rejected by the TPO. As the Ld. D.R. has not disputed the correctness of the facts in the chart filed by the assessee, the same is taken on record. 3.1. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee also submitted that the assessee has though raised as ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is the contention of the assessee that while the assessee is into only providing software development services to it s A.E., e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., is functionally different as it is engaged in rendering of both I.T. and ITES Services. He has submitted that the financials of e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., also does not give segmental data and there are huge variations in the margins of the said company from the earlier assessment years. He further submitted that during the relevant assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gard to the rival contentions and the material on record, we find that the assessee had raised objections about inclusion of this company (e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd.,) before the TPO but the TPO after considering the financials of this company has retained this company as a comparable. We find that assessee has also filed the financials of e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd. before us. On comparison of the particulars considered by the TPO and the particulars filed by the assessee before us with regard t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f Corporate Affairs, Government of India, e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., is in the status of amalgamated during the relevant financial year. This information is fresh information which was not available before the authorities below. For the sake of clarity and ready reference, the information relating to this company which is reproduced by the TPO in his order at page 36 and the information produced by the assessee company before us at pages 10 and 11 of the paper book filed by the assessee before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e business and does not have any physical inventory. Therefore, the provisions of clause-4(ii) of the Companies (Auditor s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the company. Further, the taxpayer has reported its income to be derived from software services. The relevant extract of P & L account is as under - Schedule 2009-2010 Rs. 2008-2009 Rs. Income from Software Services 7 430,466,481 503,658,971 Software Development Expenses 8 206,674,788 212,384,050 In notes to the accounts, the fol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mation as required under paragraph 3.4C and 4D of part-II of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act, 1956. In view of the above, the contention of the taxpayer is rejected and the company is retained as a comparable. (Page 10 and 11 of the paper book filed by the assessee) 16. Segment Information : Information about Primary Segments : The company is primarily engaged in Software Development and I.T. enabled services which is considered the only reportable business segment as per Accounting Standard AS .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmation considered by the A.O. said to be belonging to e-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., and the information filed by the assessee before us are at variance with each other, we deem it fit and proper to remand the comparability of this company with the assessee to the file of A.O./TPO to ascertain the correct facts and take a decision in accordance with law. It is no doubt settled by various judicial precedents that where segmental data is not available, such company cannot be taken as a comparable. F .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version