Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Gozaria Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd. Mehsana Versus The DCIT Patan Circle Patan

2017 (5) TMI 838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Disallowance of provision for depreciation in value of government securities as per RBI guidelines - Held that:- We find that the aforesaid issue is squarely covered in favour of assessee in its own case for AY 2007-08 and AY 2009-10 as held depreciation in value was allowable even if specific instructions of the board were not there. Circular and instruction of the CBDT being squarely applicable on facts of assessee’s case, so CIT(A) was justified in allowing the same which needs no interferenc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I 5 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ) has clearly observed that by way of special provision under s.36(1)(viia), the banks are allowed to claim deduction subject to a ceiling or a limit. As per section 36(1)(viia), the banks are entitled to claim deduction certain prescribed percentages of the average advance made by the rural branches of such banks. However, relevant facts about the advance by the rural branch requires to be verified in the light of section 36(1)(viia) read with Rule 6ABA of the Incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, AM: The captioned appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-Gandhinagar, [CIT(A) in short] dated 06/09/2013 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the Assessee read as under:- 1. The order passed by the learned CIT(A) is bad in law and contrary to the provisions of law & facts. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in law as well as on facts in confirming the disallowance made by AO with respect to provision for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s submitted that it be so held now. 2.3. The learned CIT(A) as well as AO erred in disregarding Instructions and Circulars issued by CBDT for assessment of banks in making above disallowances. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in law as well as on facts in confirming the disallowance made by AO with respect to premium amortization expenses on government securities as per guidelines of RBI for a sum of ₹ 4,57,920/-. 4. The learned CIT(A) as well as AO erred in disallowing the provision on Standar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business loss under s.28 r.w.s.37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). We find that the aforesaid issue is squarely covered in favour of assessee in its own case for AY 2007-08 in ITA No.1026/Ahd/2011 order dated 13/03/2005 and AY 2009-10 in ITA No.369/Ahd/2013 order dated 19/10/2016. The relevant para of the order of the Tribunal in ITA No.1026/Ahd/2011 (supra) is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- 5. After going through rival submissions and mat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shown in the balance sheet as investment. Further, banks are showing gain or loss arises from sale of security as business income/loss rather than capital gain. The above position has also been clarified by Circular no. 665 dated 05-10-1993. "The question whether a particular item of investment in securities constitutes stock-in-trade or a capital asset is a question of fact In fact, the banks are generally governed by the instructions of the Reserve Bank of India from time to time with re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

26.11,2008 (F. No. 228/3/3008 - ITA-III). Point no. VII of the said instruction, which has been discussed above. The accounts had been maintained and shown as per RBI guidelines. The depreciation of assets has been claimed on securities which had been classified as Available for Sale (AFS). As per the board's circular, the depreciation is to be aggregated scrip wise and net depreciation, if any, is required to be provided for in the accounts. Same is the claim of assessee. Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

securities has correctly been claimed. So, claim of assessee is allowable as per circular and instruction. Similar claim of depreciation and value of Government securities was made and allowed in earlier assessment year. In such circumstances, same method of accounting has been followed and disallowed from year to year. Such claim has been allowed by various judicial pronouncements. Hon'ble Mumbai High court in case of CIT vs Bank of Baroda (2003) 262 ITR 334 has held that "Depredation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ruction of the CBDT being squarely applicable on facts of assessee s case, so CIT(A) was justified in allowing the same which needs no interference from our side. We uphold the same. 5. We see no reasons to depart with the view already taken by the Tribunal. 6. Ground No.2 of assessee s appeal is allowed. 7. Ground No.3 relates to premium amortization expenses on Government securities. As pointed out by the Ld.AR for the assessee, we find that the issue is squarely covered in favour of assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bts components of the standard assets. It was claimed that though the provision for bad debt is not expressly allowed as per Income Tax Act, but as per section 36(1)(viia) banks are allowed to claim provision of bad and doubtful debts subject to 7.5% of the Gross total income and 10% of average rural advances. In this case, the assessee bank while computing the total income added back provision of ₹ 1,50,000/- and claimed as deduction under s.36(1)(viia) which well within the limits prescr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version