Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Global Capital Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-12 (1) , New Delhi.

2015 (11) TMI 1667 - ITAT DELHI

Disallowance under section 14A computation - total exempt income earned by the present assessee is ₹ 13,35,040 against which an addition of ₹ 21,87,713 has been made by AO u/s 14A - Held that:- As noted in the case of Joint Investment (P) Ltd. vs CIT (2015 (3) TMI 155 - DELHI HIGH COURT) the disallowance u/s 14A should not exceed the exempt income. The Tribunal also noted that the Hon’ble Delhi high Court in the case of CIT vs Holcim India Pvt. Ltd. (2014 (9) TMI 434 - DELHI HIGH COU .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dividend income was earned. Hence, we direct the Assessing Officer that the disallowance u/s 14A be restricted to ₹ 11,53,752 (Rs. 13,35,040 – ₹ 1,81,388) and the remaining amount of disallowance is directed to be deleted. - Decided partly in favour of assessee. - I.T.A. No. 6586/Del/2013 - Dated:- 27-11-2015 - Chandra Mohan Garg (Judicial Member) And O. P. Kant (Accountant Member) For the Appellant : Manu K. Giri, Adv. For the Respondent : Gaurav Dudeja, Sr. DR ORDER Chandra Mohan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he addition of ₹ 21,87,713/- made by the assessing officer u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, resulting in addition to returned Income to that extent. 2. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in holding that disallowance under Rule 8D has been correctly worked out in accordance with the provisions of Rule 8D. 3. We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the relevant material placed on record. At the very outset, learned counsel of the assessee submitted a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ention towards para 4 of the Tribunal order (supra). 4. Learned Departmental Representative strongly supported the orders of the authorities below, however, he fairly accepted that in the similar set of facts and circumstances, the amount of disallowance has been restricted to the exempt income. 5. Firstly, it would be appropriate to reproduce the relevant part of the order of the Tribunal (supra) which has been relied by the learned counsel of the assessee which reads as follows:- 4. We have he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14) 90 CCH 081-DEL-Hon'ble High Court , has held that there can be no disallowance u/s 14A in the absence of any exempt income. The rationale behind these judgments is that the amount of disallowance u/s 14A should not exceed the exempt income. Since the total exempt income in the instant case is ₹ 25,38,020/-, we direct that the disallowance u/s 14A be restricted to ₹ 18,01,968/- (Rs.25,38,020-Rs.7,36,052/-). The remaining amount of disallowance is directed to be deleted. 6. In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version