Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Hotel Sky Park Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT)

Levy of purchase tax - purchase of unbranded snacks - Held that: - the petitioner produced purchase bills and that it was verified and found in order in respect of proposal of Tax at S.Nos.3 to 7 of the items, out of which S.No.7 admittedly is in respect of purchase tax under Section 7(A) of unbranded (re-sale) at 4%. Therefore, it is evident that the petitioner had produced purchase details in respect of these snacks unbranded item and the same were verified and found in order by the Assessing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l - petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - Writ Petition No. 40361 of 2016, WMP. No. 34430 of 2016 - Dated:- 17-3-2017 - K. Ravichandrabaabu, JJ. For Petitioner : Mr. T. Pramodkumar Chopda For Respondent : Mr.K.Venkatesh ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent dated 21.10.2016, wherein, the proposal made by the respondent under notice dated 27.07.2007 issued under Section 55 of the TNGST Act, 1959, was confirmed. 2. The short facts that arises for co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Assessment Authority by determining the total and taxable turn over as ₹ 1,88,41,585/- and ₹ 31,39,664/- respectively, thereby determining the tax and surcharge as ₹ 55,762/- and ₹ 2,437/- respectively. The petitioner has paid the said tax and surcharge, as reflected in the said order of the assessment itself. Thereafter, on 27.07.2007, a notice was issued for revision of the assessment, however by claiming the same as the one under Section 55 of the said Act. It .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evy penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the said Act. The petitioner gave reply / objections to the said notice on 01.08.2007. They also sought for a personal hearing before passing the revision assessment order, if the objections raised by the petitioner were not accepted. The respondent did not proceed further for nearly nine years. Thereafter, a reminder notice, dated 30.09.2016 was issued to the petitioner calling upon them to file their objections to the revision notice dated 27.07.2007 withi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

55 of the TNGST Act by passing an order under such provisions on 21.10.2016 is challenged in this writ petition mainly by contending that the same is barred by limitation as provided under Section 55 (1) of the said Act. Even otherwise on merits, it is contended that the petitioner is not a Star Hotel, as presumed by the respondent, and on the other hand, it is only recognized by the ITDC. Insofar as the allegation that the petitioner had purchased snacks for ₹ 15,15,099/- and that they d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mitation, but also on the ground that the same is an outcome of non-application of mind. It is also their case that the impugned order is liable to be set aside on the ground of violation of natural justice, as the petitioner was not given personal hearing. 4. A counter affidavit is filed by the respondent, wherein, it is contended that though the notice issued to the petitioner dated 27.07.2007 was quoted as the one issued under Section 55 of the said Act, in effect, it is only a notice under S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he impugned order passed after a period of five years is barred by limitation. He has also invited my attention to the original order of assessment and the notice for revision dated 27.07.2007 to contend that the respondent has committed error apparent on the face of such proceedings without considering the fact that the petitioner has already furnished the purchase details with regard to purchase of snacks. 6. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent supported th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the said order of the Assessment, S.No.5 of the commodity was referred to as "snacks unbranded" (re-sale) with the value of ₹ 15,15,099/- and the proposed purchase tax towards the same was referred to under Section 7(A) as 4%. It was also referred to in the said order that the petitioner produced purchase bills and that it was verified and found in order in respect of proposal of Tax at S.Nos.3 to 7 of the items, out of which S.No.7 admittedly is in respect of purchase tax und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment order and the notice for revision itself that the respondent has factually committed mistake in issuing the revision notice in respect of the purchase of unbranded snacks. Therefore, I find that the said claim of the respondent is erroneous on the face of the original order of assessment and the notice issued for revision. Therefore, there is no necessity for the respondent to re-visit the matter in respect of such items of purchase of snacks. 10. While coming to the next issue with regard .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version