Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Delhi-I Versus M/s A.D. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd.

2017 (5) TMI 953 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Imposition of personal penalty u/r 26 - The Revenue contested the impugned order on the ground that the facility of closure of proceedings as contemplated in Section 11A (2) is not applicable for the proceedings for confiscation of finished goods/raw material u/r 25 and also for imposition of penalty u/r 26 - Held that: - Admittedly, the case against the respondent is with reference to the duty demand and improper accounting. There is a single notice for both the parties (manufacturing unit and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he proceedings initiated through the show cause notice comes to an end. - Appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - E/3254 of 2009 (SM) - A/53369/2017-SM[BR] - Dated:- 18-5-2017 - Shri B. Ravichandran, Member ( Technical ) Shri K. Poddar, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the appellant Shri Kumar Vikram, Advocate - for the respondent ORDER Per: B. Ravichandran The Revenue is aggrieved by the order dated 01/09/2009 of Commissioner (Appeals), Delhi - I. A case of improper accounting and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalty under Rule 26 on the Director of the respondent. The respondents have paid an amount of ₹ 31,31,000/- during the course of investigation itself, before the issue of show cause notice. The case was adjudicated by the Original Authority who confirmed the duty demand; confiscated the goods as proposed in the notice with option to redeem on payment of fine. He appropriated the duty amount from already paid amount. He also appropriated 25% of the said duty amount towards penalty. He fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ings in respect of respondent manufacturer as well as its Director should have been concluded. Aggrieved by this order, the Revenue is in appeal. 2. The learned AR elaborated the grounds of appeal and the learned Counsel for the respondent supported the impugned order and submitted certain case laws in this regard. 3. I have heard both the sides and perused the appeal records. The Revenue contested the impugned order on the ground that the facility of closure of proceedings as contemplated in Se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e by the person on whom notice is served under sub-Section (1), determine the amount of duty of excise due from such person (not being in excess of the amount specified in the notice) and thereupon such person shall pay the amount so determined. [Provided that if such person has paid the duty in full together with, interest and penalty under sub-section (1A), the proceedings in respect of such person and other persons to whom notice are served under sub- Section (1) shall, without prejudice to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies (manufacturing unit and the Director). The proceedings are common and the matter is same. The interpretation of Revenue that the proceedings under Rule 25 and Rule 26 will continue to hold good, even after payment of full duty liability alongwith interest and 25% of penalty, is against the provisions of Section 11A (2). 5. The Tribunal in various earlier occasions had examined similar set of issues and held that the proceedings initiated in the same show cause notice shall stand concluded an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version