GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2013 (8) TMI 1040 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2013 (8) TMI 1040 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - TMI - ITA No. 695 of 2008 (O&M) - Dated:- 21-8-2013 - Ajay Kumar Mittal And Jaspal Singh, JJ. For the Appellant : Tejinder Joshi, Advocate For the Respondent : None Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. The revenue has preferred this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act ) against the order dated 30.11.2007, Annexure A.VI passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'H' New Delhi (in short, the Tribunal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee, according to the learned counsel for the appellant was preposterous, and as such, even though the respondent-assessee had disclosed the aforesaid income, he was liable to be levied penalty under Section 271(1) (c) of the Act, and that, explanation 1 under Section 271(1) of the Act would not be applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case on account of the fact that the explanation tendered by the respondent-assessee cannot be considered as bonafide in view of the explicit and cle .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sources and restored the case to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. In pursuance of this order, assessment in this case was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 31.3.2005 at an Income of ₹ 58,55,570/- treating the interest on FDRs as income from other sources as against business income as claimed by the assessee. Therefore, the assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of its income. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of ₹ 33,66,953/- under S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed appeal before the Tribunal. Vide order dated 30.11.2007, Annexure A-VI, impugned herein, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and cancelled the penalty levied under Section 271(1) (c) of the Act, holding that the claim of the assessee was bonafide and was in line with the judicial thinking on the issue at the relevant point of time when it filed its return of Income. The assessee had disclosed all facts relating to the interest income. Aggrieved by the order, the revenue is before this court throu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urate. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and do not find any merit in the appeal. 5. The Tribunal while cancelling the penalty in para 9 of its order dated 30.11.2007, had recorded as under:- 9. We have considered these rival submissions. At the outset we have to mention that the facts with regard to the interest income have been duly disclosed by the assessee in the notes to the computation of income filed alongwith the return of income. We have already extracted the note in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rtaking or income from other sources. This was one position as on the date when the assessee filed its return of income. The legal position however became clear after the pronouncements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pandian Chemicals Limited (supra). This decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was rendered in the year 2003. In the circumstances we have to accept the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee that the question whether interest Income should be consid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the facts of the given case. The Assessing Officer was not required to make any further inquiries to find out if there was any inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee. In such circumstances the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Nath Brothers (supra) and the Rajasthan State High Court in the case of Harshvardhan Chemicals and Minerals (supra) will squarely apply. In the circumstances the charge of concealment of income levied on the assessee in our view is w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

relating to the interest income. Therefore all material facts relevant for computation of total income have been duly disclosed. Therefore the burden that lays on the assessee under explanation 1 is also discharged in the present case. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the judicial pronouncements referred to by the learned counsel for the assessee we are of the view that no penalty ought to have been imposed on the assessee. We therefore direct that the penalty imposed be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version