Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Ambey Laboratories, M/s. D.K. Traders, M/s. Aggarwal Agencies, M/s. S.D. Distributors And Shri Puran Chand Satish Kumar Versus CCE Delhi-I

2017 (6) TMI 374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Valuation - Quantity discount - includibility - Held that: - quantity discount will not be allowable for determination of duty liability u/s 4A - the appellant assessee has been following the long standing practice of granting such quantity discount to their traders. This was being mentioned in ER-1, RG-1 and invoices regularly. The records of the assessee were also being periodically audited by the Department. Consequently, any allegation of willful suppression of facts with intention to evade .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

premises - goods were received from the appellant’s factory without payment of duty - Held that: - The seized goods are claimed to be those supplied free along with invoiced quantity. Consequently we do not find any justification for confiscation of the same at the dealer’s premises - confiscation, redemption fine and penalty set aside. - Clandestine removal - Production as per input-output ratio - demand on the ground that production of goods, was suppressed when it is estimated in terms o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cture and clearances - without tangible evidence, charge of clandestine clearances cannot be upheld - demand set aside. - Clandestine removal - seizure at factory - Held that: - the goods said to be excess were found within the factory - since the goods remained within the factory there is no justification for seizure and confiscation of such goods - confiscation, redemption fine and penalty set aside. - The case is remanded to the adjudicating authority for the limited purpose of re-qua .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

soap based cleaner, powder, naphthalene balls falling under Chapter 38 of the Central Excise Tariff. On information, their factory premises along with the premises of other traders were searched by the Departmental officers. On 12.09.2006 as a result of the search and also the investigation conducted thereafter, show cause notice dated 09.03.2007 stands issued to the assessee and other traders. The matter was adjudicated by the Additional Commissioner in which duty demands on various counts were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Commissioner (A), the present set of appeals has been filed. All these appeals are being disposed of through this common order. 2. With the above background, we have heard Shri J.P Kaushik, Advocate the appellant and Shri R.K. Mishra, DR for the respondent. 3. The various grounds on which the impugned order has been challenged are discussed below one by one alongwith our decisions thereon: i) Quantity discount The assessee have been clearing black disinfectant fluid (Black phenyl), on paymen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

benefit of Small scale exemption notification no. 08/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003. Duty demand of ₹ 8,97,999/- + Cess of ₹ 10,456/- stands confirmed on the above ground for the period 01.03.2003 to 12.09.2006. The submission of the appellant is that discount in any form will be allowable and even under the provisions of section 4A, such discounts will be admissible as has been held by the Tribunal in the case of Vinayak Mosquito Coil Manufacturing Vs. CCE 2004 (174) ELT 107 (Tri-Bang.). .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ench decision quantity discount will not be allowable for determination of duty liability under section 4A. However, we find that the appellant assessee has been following the long standing practice of granting such quantity discount to their traders. This was being mentioned in ER-1, RG-1 and invoices regularly. The records of the assessee were also being periodically audited by the Department. Consequently, we are of the view that any allegation of willful suppression of facts with intention t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e CBEC has clarified in its circular number 446/12/99-CEX dated 17.03.1999 that such goods will be rightly classifiable under 3808.90. The circular is binding on the department which cannot take a contrary view. We have gone through the CBEC Circular dated 17.03.1999. Even though the circular suggests classification of impugned goods under 3808.90, we find that the classification of these goods have been decided by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the appellants own case for an earlier period under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

showing the clearance of the same. The claim of the appellants before the authorities below, as well as in the present proceedings is that the goods alleged to have been cleared clandestinely and seized at the buyer s premises are the goods which were given to them under invoice as part of the free supply under the quantity discount scheme. In the above para, it has been held that quantity discount was a long standing practice of the appellant, and hence demand is to be restricted to the normal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

suppressed when it is estimated in terms of the input output ratio. Revenue has taken the view that the unaccounted production has been clandestinely cleared. This allegation is based on one consumption of the raw material, rosin . The Department, during the course of investigation determined that the basic raw material 490 kgs of rosin produces 3500 ltrs of black phenyl. This raw material consumption has also been accepted by the appellant. On the basis of periodical returns, stock registers, d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed out for the period 01.02.2002 to 12.09.2006, but the figure has been taken from 01.01.2002 which is erroneous. They also have submitted the Chartered Accountant certificate in support of their arguments. The quantum of goods manufactured has been estimated on the basis of consumption of one raw material rosin by the department. While this course of action can give an indication as to the quantity of goods manufactured, however the same cannot be used as a measure to determine the quantum of g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dence has been produced by Revenue to support the charge of clandestine manufacture and clearances. It is settled position of law that without tangible evidence, charge of clandestine clearances cannot be upheld. In the light of this observation we conclude that the duty demand merits to be set aside on this ground. v) Seizure at Factory At the time of search of the factory by the Departmental officers on 12.09.2006, the officers noticed that a part of the production was not accounted in the sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version