GST Helpdesk   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
GST - Acts SGST - Acts GST - FAQ GST Rates, Exemption CGST Notif. IGST Notif. Exempt Income Salary income
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (6) TMI 802 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2017 (6) TMI 802 - CESTAT BANGALORE - TMI - Natural justice - recovery proceedings against a dead person - Held that: - the appellant who is a sole partnership concern of Shri V.P. Viswanathan Nair who as per the death certificate has died on 29.05.2015 when the appeal was pending before the Tribunal - reliance was placed in the case of Shabina Abraham Vs. Collector of CE & Customs [2015 (7) TMI 1036 - SUPREME COURT], where it was held that no recovery proceedings can be initiated against the de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al is directed against the impugned Order-in-Original No. 27/2007 dated 24/05/2007. Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellant is a proprietary concern solely engaged in the manufacture of Canan Kinetiser on job work basis for M/s. Canan Technologies, Ernakulam. The job work mainly consists of assembly of components into final product. These Kinetisers are after the job work are returned to the Bangalore office of Canan Technologies in bulk packing of eight pieces per box and thereafte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nan Technologies at Bangalore and Ernakulum and the premises of another related firm i.e. M/s. Canan Technologies Private Limited, Ernakulam and seized goods, documents/records and thereafter conducted the investigation. After completion of the investigation, a show-cause notice was issued to the appellant and by following the due process, the demand was confirmed and also imposed penalties. Aggrieved by the said order, assessee preferred appeal before the CESTAT and the Hon ble CESTAT remanded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubmitted that the present appeal was filed in 2007 and during the pendency of this appeal, the sole proprietor Shri V.P. Viswanathan Nair has died on 29.05.2015 and his death certificate has been produced on record. The learned counsel further submitted that as per Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules 1983, the present appeal abates upon the death of the appellant. 3.1. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that it is a settled law that no recovery proceedings can be initiated aga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

E.L.T. 372 (S.C) e) MRs Bharati Mulchand Chheda Vs. CCE, Mumbai-V 2016-TIOL-694-CESTAT-MUM. f) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. CCE 2014 (33) S.T.R. 332 (Tri.-Del.) 3.2. The learned counsel further submitted that as per Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, the appeal shall abate on the death of the appellant. The said Rule is reproduced herein below: RULE 22. Continuance of proceedings after death or adjudication as an insolvent of a party to the appeal or application: Where in any proceedings th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version