New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Late Sh. Prem Singh through L/h Rajesh Kumar C/o Shri P.S. Deepak Advocate And Reeta Versus ITO Ward-2 Roorkee

Addition of opening capital carry forwarded from previous year - Held that:- If no evidence or material was produced before the authorities below to show how assessee was having availability of any fund with him or to have any opening capital balance addition is justified. In the absence of any evidence, it is difficult to accept the explanation of the assessee. It is a clear case of building capital and to show opening capital balance. Also suppose any assessee may declare any huge amount in ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of popular trees or he has actually sold the popular tree to Mr. Khali, no interference is called for in the matter. Similarly production of receipt and statement recorded by AO orally is not sufficient to discharge onus upon assessee to prove genuineness of the transaction in the matter and actual sale transaction of popular tree. In the absence of any evidence or material on record no interference is called for in the matter. - Decided against assessee. - ITA No. 2939/Del/2013, And ITA No. 29 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sment year - 2009-10 3. This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) I Dehradun dated 27thFebruary, 2013 for asstt. year 2009- 10. 4. Ground No. 1 and 2 are general and need not adjudication. Ld. Counsel for assessee did not press ground No. 4 of the appeal. Same is dismissed as not pressed. 5. On ground No. 3 assessee challenged the addition of ₹ 80,000/- out of opening capital of ₹ 1,80,000/- carry forward from previous year i.e. asstt. Year 2008-09. 6. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment. In appeal it was submitted by assessee that the assessee had furnished his return of income for asstt. year 2008-09 showing capital balance of ₹ 2,40,000/- and mentioned that out of the same an amount of ₹ 1,80,000/- had been invested in asstt. Year 2009-10 for wine shop. A copy was also filed in support of the contention. Ld. CIT(A) noted that assessee was not assessed to tax regularly. The return of income for asstt. Year 2008-09 was furnished on 16th September, 2009 i.e almo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A) therefore noted that it is apparent that return for asstt., year 2008-09 had been furnished just to build capital as it showed opening balance of ₹ 1,00,000/- income of ₹ 2,00,000/- including agricultural income. No tax was paid because return was shown to be below taxable limit. The AO rejected the claim. The computation of income for that year would also be below taxable. The opening cash balance cannot be accepted simply because assessee has furnished return showing equivalent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(A) noted that the return for preceding assessment year 2008-09 was furnished on 16th September, 2009 i.e after filing of the return for assessment year under appeal. It is also admitted facts that assessee was not regularly assessed to tax. Therefore, there was no evidence available with the assessee of having any opening balance with him in preceding assessment year 2008-09 as well as there were no evidence available to have accumulated amount of ₹ 2,40,000/- in earlier years. The assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authorities below to show how assessee was having availability of any fund with him or to have any opening capital balance addition is justified. In the absence of any evidence, it is difficult to accept the explanation of the assessee. It is a clear case of building capital and to show opening capital balance. Ld. Counsel for assessee submitted that ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of Vinod Kumar accepted the opening capital balance of earlier year. However, the facts now considered by the Ld. CIT( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f assessee thus has no merit the same is accordingly dismissed. 8. On ground No. 5 assessee challenged the addition of ₹ 4,10,000/- on account of sale of trees to Shri Khalil. The Ld. CIT(A) noted that assessee claimed to have received a sum of ₹ 4,10,000/- by way of sale of trees from Mr. Khalil. Mr. Khalil appeared before the AO and confirmed the transaction. He also submitted that he had received money from a commission agent of timber. The AO was not satisfied with the explanatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee, it would not mean that transaction was explained. The capacity of the buyer and the genuineness of the transaction are as important factor which should be established. The assessee has not proved anything. Therefore oral testimony of Mr. Khalil will not suffice. The addition was confirmed and this ground was dismissed. 9. After considering rival submissions, we do not find any merit in this ground of appeal of assessee. Ld. Counsel for assessee reiterated the submissions made before autho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version