Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

A.C. Shyam Sundar Versus Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range XIV, Chennai

Denial of exemption u/s.54F - nom deposit in capital gains account scheme before due date u/sec. 139(1) - Held that:- As decided in the case of CIT vs. R.L. Sood (1999 (9) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court) were the date of agreement to purchase should be taken as the date of purchase. On applying the ratio to current circumstances, the assessee entered into agreement with builder for undivided share of land and construction agreement on 03.02.2011 which is very much before provisions of Sec. 139(4) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the opinion that assessee complied the conditions and is eligible for exemption u/s.54F of the Act. We set aside the order of CIT(Appeals) and direct AO to grant exemption u/s.54F of the Act on the remaining construction cost which was invested in the residential property before due date u/s.139(4) of the Act and allow the grounds of the assessee. - I.T.A. No. 2279/Mds/2015 - Dated:- 6-5-2016 - A. Mohan Alankamony (Accountant Member) And G. Pavan Kumar (Judicial Member) For the Appellant : R. Ga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

firming the findings of the Assessing Officer on denial of exemption u/s.54F of the Act as ₹ 36,00,000/- was not deposited in capital gains account scheme before due date u/sec. 139(1) of the Act. 3. The Brief facts of the case that the assessee is an individual and having income from salary, long term capital gains and interest income and filed return of income on 03.11.2011 disclosing total income of ₹ 5,72,246/- The return of income was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act, subsequentl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

12,820/-. The assessee claimed exemption u/s.54F of the Act on investment in the construction of residential house property. The assessee has complied the conditions u/s.54F of the Act by entering into construction and undivided share of land agreements on 03.02.2011 for total value of ₹ 66,64,457/- and assessee has invested ₹ 59,88,000/- in construction works. But the ld. Assessing Officer found the guideline value of the property as ₹ 82,28,252/- as per the Sub-Registrar Offi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) of the Act, and remaining amount of ₹ 36,00,000/- was paid on 23.09.2011 ₹ 10,00,000/-, 03.02.2012 ₹ 6,00,000/- and on 10.03.2012 ₹ 20,00,000/- total aggregating ₹ 36,00,000/- and also obtained confirmation from builder. The Assessing Officer alleged that assessee has invested in the construction of property ₹ 30,00,000/- before due date of filing return and violated conditions of Sec. 54F by not depositing the remaining in capital gain account scheme and re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e and purchase of property and filed written submissions on 27.10.2015 referred at page No. 4 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order were ld. Authorised Representative supported the submissions relying on judicial decisions. The ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) considered the factual issues, grounds, written submissions and findings of the Assessing Officer has elaboratively discussed in his order and concurred with the order of Assessing Officer and upheld. Aggrieved by the order of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reement assessee has paid ₹ 30,00,000/- before due date of filing of return u/s.139(1) of the Act and balance was paid by installments before 31.03.2012. The investment was made within the extended period and before end of assessment year and assessee under a belief that the provision of capital gain account scheme are not applicable and prayed for deletion of additions. 6. Contra, the ld. Departmental Representative argued that the assessee has not utilized the sale consideration before d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nvested in purchase of residential flat as per builder agreement entered on 03.02.2011. The assessee has paid ₹ 30,00,000/- before 31.07.2011 as per the evidence produced by builder in letter dated 18.02.2014 and remaining amount paid in three instalments before 31.03.2012 which is not disputed by the Assessing authority. The crux of the disputed issue arise before Assessing Officer that the assessee should have deposited the amount in the capital gain accounts scheme before 139(1) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and the assessee has, within a period of one year before or [two years] after the date on which the transfer took place purchased, or has within a period of three years after that date [constructed, a residential house] (hereafter in this section referred to as the new asset), the capital gain shall be dealt with in accordance with the following provisions of this section, that is to say,- (a) if the cost of the new asset is not less than the net consideration in respect of the original asset, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r than the new asset, on the date of transfer of the original asset; or (ii) purchases any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of one year after the date of transfer of the original asset; or (iii) constructs any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; and (b) the income from such residential house, other than the one residential house owned on the date of transfer of the original asset .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the above facts and provisions of law, the assessee has invested total consideration of ₹ 66,64,457/- before due date u/sec. 139(4) of the Act being 31.03.2013. The investment in residential property has to be within three years from the date of transfer of vacant land on 02.10.2010. The assessee has not deposited in capital gain accounts scheme ₹ 36,00,000/- before 139(1) of the Act but complied with the conditions u/s.54F(1) of the Act on purchasing and construction of residential .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version