New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Kundan Chains Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Kanpur

Manufacture of imitation jewellery - It was alleged that appellant failed to get registered with Central Excise Department and follow Central Excise procedures in spite of having been engaged in the manufacture of dutiable goods viz. Imitation Jewellery - effects of amendment - validity of SCN - Held that: - the amendment that was brought in as on 13.05.2005 by insertion of words of base metal, whether or not plated with precious metal was not applicable for the clearance of chains of base metal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said Show Cause Notice even for the period 13.05.2005 to 10.10.2005 is not sustainable - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - E/3749/2006-EX[DB] - A/70603/2017-EX[DB] - Dated:- 12-6-2017 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) None for Appellant Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Superintendent (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present is filed by the appellant - M/s Kundan Chains against Order-in-Original No.15/Commr./MP/200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

003-CE dated 01.03.2003. It was also stated in the said Show Cause Notice that Imitation Jewellery was attracting effective rate of Central Excise duty and for the same was as follows:- Period Rate of Duty Effective Rate of Central Excise Duty Relevant Notification No. & Date for Effective Rate 01.03.2001 to 28.02.2002 16% 4% Sr. No.262(d) of Notification No. 3/2001-CE dated 01.03.2001 01.03.2002 to 28.02.2003 16% 8% Sr. No.3 of Notification No.10/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 01.03.2003 to 08.07 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Imitation Jewellery. It was stated in the said Show Cause Notice that Imitation Jewellery was manufactured in the factory of appellant with the aid of Wires & Sheets of Iron, Copper, Aluminium, etc. and that some of said Imitation Jewellery was also being coated with the Plating of Nickel, Gold, Chrome, Silver, Laker, etc. During the course of investigation as reflected in the said Show Cause Notice statement of Shri Dharmendra Kumar Agarwal, Partner of the appellant was recorded on 10.10.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Challans dated 14.10.2005, 07.11.2005, 05.12.2005, 02.01.2006, 23.02.2006 & 02.03.2006. For the purpose of Heading 7113 the explanation Articles of Jewellery means any small object of personal adornment. It was alleged in the said Show Cause Notice that un-plated Imitation Jewellery was also attracting Central Excise duty and appellant were clearing said goods attracting Central Excise duty without payment of duty treating the same as not attracting Central Excise duty and as a result evade .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

visited their manufacturing unit in the year 2001. The Departmental Officers had satisfied themselves that such goods were not liable to pay Central Excise duty and therefore the Department had no right to issue Show Cause Notice under extended period. The appellant submitted before the Original Authority that they had given declaration that the goods manufactured by them which were not subjected to plating were non-excisable goods and Departmental Officers had satisfied themselves that such go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Note '9'. He, further, elaborated that it was very clear from the definition of Imitation Jewellery that both plated/coated, un-plated/uncoated Imitation Jewellery was covered under the above Chapter Heading 7117 and the same have been elaborated by insertion of the words whether or not plated with precious metal. He, further, confirmed the demand and imposed equal penalty. Aggrieved by the said order appellant is before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the appellant, who .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e 7(a) above i. e. any small object of personal adornment and that said legal position underwent change with effect from 13.05.2005 Imitation Jewellery was brought under Tariff Item No. 71179090 with effect from 01.03.2005 & with effect from 13.05.2005 there was addition of words "of base metal, whether or not plated with precious metal". He, further, argued that chains of base metals manufactured by them which were not plated with precious metal were treated as goods manufactured .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version