TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 552X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... letter of adjournment, the petitioner had indicated that he would not be in a position to be represented in the personal hearing on 22.02.2017, and an opportunity was sought for a personal hearing in the month of March 2017. Ext.P5 order passed by the respondent is without reference to the said request for adjournment made by the petitioner. At any rate, no prejudice will be caused, if a fresh or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the hearing before the Commissioner, the petitioner had, as a matter of fact, by Ext.P4 request for adjournment submitted to the office of the respondent on 21.02.2017, clearly indicated that it would be inconvenient for him to appear for the hearing on 22.02.2017, and he had sought for a personal hearing on any date in the month of March 2017. It is stated that Ext.P5 order was passed without not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e personal hearing on 22.02.2017, and an opportunity was sought for a personal hearing in the month of March 2017. Ext.P5 order passed by the respondent is without reference to the said request for adjournment made by the petitioner. At any rate, I am of the view that, no prejudice will be caused, if a fresh order of adjudication is passed after hearing the petitioner, considering that there is no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
