TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 564X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... en if, that measure is applied, the Appellant/Assessee has paid more than the amount prescribed under Section 35F(iii) of the 1944 Act - interim order granted by this Court on 18.06.2014 shall continue to operate till the adjudication of the appeal by the Tribunal - appeal allowed. - C.M.A. No. 1567 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 28-6-2017 - Rajiv Shakdher And R. Suresh Kumar, JJ. For the Petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rpose, a period of two (2) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of aforementioned order, was given to the Appellant/Assessee. 3. The Appellant/Assessee, it appears, had filed a memo of compliance, dated 02.07.2014, to demonstrate that it had deposited a sum of ₹ 2 crores on 26.06.2014. 4. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, who appears for the Respondent/Revenue, does not dispute the fact that a sum ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erefore, even if, that measure is applied, the Appellant/Assessee has paid more than the amount prescribed under Section 35F(iii) of the 1944 Act. 7.1. Furthermore, we find that the appeal, on merits, has not been adjudicated for nearly, three (3) years. 8. Having regard to the aforesaid circumstances, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and direct a hearing of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
