Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kamal Kishore Gupta, Prop. -M/s Kamal Deep Jewellers Versus A.C.I.T., Central Circle-2, Jaipur

Exemption u/s 10A - reconstruction of the existing unit or new unit - scope of manufacturing - ‘splitting up or reconstruction’ of an existing business for the purpose of section 10A - Assessee is manufacturer and exporter of jewellery - proof of purchases - Held that:- As per the condition of the allotment of plot for establishing the industry at SEZ, Sitapura, Jaipur, the assessee to export the assessee’s products and the unit is to be achieve positive net foreign exchange earner every year. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SEZ unit, thus, the revenue’s claim that the assessee was only trading in the goods, is not factually correct. - The statements taken by the revenue of two of the suppliers were never confronted to the assessee. No opportunity to cross examine these persons were provided. Further as stated in the above part of the order, the purchase bills of Tulsi Jewellers itself mentioned that the assessee has purchased unmounted, unpolished jewelery. The sales bill also suggest that the assessee has sol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f assessee. - ITA No. 469/JP/2015 - Dated:- 1-8-2017 - SHRI BHAGCHAND, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri Manish Agarwal (CA) For The Revenue : Shri R.A. Verma (Addl.CIT) ORDER PER: BHAGCHAND, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of the ld CIT(A)-4, Jaipur dated 30/03/2015 for the A.Y. 2010-11, wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in upholding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0A of Income tax Act, 1961 for claiming exemption more particularly when the assessee has started manufacturing activity in the year under appeal, thus the exemption u/s 10A being legitimately available to the assessee deserves to be allowed. 1.3 That the Ld. CIT(A) has further erred in observing that no new manufacturing activity was carried out in the manufacturing unit situated in SEZ and the export of goods was in continuation of his existing business without appreciating the fact that the u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed on 24/09/2010 declaring total income of ₹ 56,466/-. The assessee is manufacturer and exporter of jewellery. A new unit is situated at SEZ-II, Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur. The assessee had claimed exemption U/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) and declared turnover of ₹ 1.20 crores. The Assessing Officer did not allow the exemption U/s 10A of the Act. The ld CIT(A) has confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 3. Now the assessee is in appeal before the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee further submitted that up to the assessment year 2009-10, the assessee was engaged in the trading of precious and semi-precious stone in the name and style of M/s Kamaldeep Jewellers and the business was carried out from 877, White house, Third Floor, Ganga Mata Ki Gali, Gopal jika Rasta, Jaipur. For the year under consideration, the assessee discontinued his trading business and started a new business activity of manufacturing gold and silver jewellery embedded with precious and semi-prec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

40/-. The assessee claimed exemption u/s 10A of the Act. He further submitted that the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT(A) has not considered the claim of the assessee in right and legal perspective. The assessee has submitted all the bills pertaining to entire purchases, sales, and addition to fixed assets to the I.T. authorities. Since this was a new unit and the assessee got necessary approval from the SEZ authorities, for which the ld. CIT(A) stated that it is procedural requirement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee informed the SEZ authorities regarding commencement of commercial production at its unit. This fact itself establishes that the assessee was doing business of manufacturing of silver and gold jewellery embedded with precious and semi precious stones from its SEZ unit located in SEZ area. The other allegation of the lower authorities is that the assessee has purchased finished goods from local parties and only did the polishing before exporting, is also factually incorrect. He submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation or conclusion made by the lower authorities for making addition are unjustified. The assessee must have been given a fair opportunity to rebut such baseless allegation and also to cross examine the suppliers. He also relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs. Andaman Timber Industries reported in 2015 (324) ELT 641. He further submitted that the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT(A) has lost sight to the fact that the items purchased were plain un- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hed goods were exported. These facts clearly established that the lower authorities were not justified in denying exemption to the assessee. After procurement of raw material (un-mounted castings of metals and precious and semiprecious stones in rough form) these items are studded/embedded by cut and polished precious and semi-precious stones. Assessee did cutting and polishing of rough precious and semi-precious stones and after that the polishing and finishing of studded/ mounted metal casting .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d that definition of the term manufacture from the EXIM policy and upheld the process of blending and packaging of tea, as amounting to manufacture for the purpose of claiming exemption u/s 10A of the Act. The other allegation that the assessee has formed unit from the reconstruction of an export unit also not based on the facts. The assessee has established a new proprietorship unit opened at SEZ under the same name & style of M/s Kamal Deep Jewellers, therefore, no stock carry forward from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

v. DCIT (ITA No. 1015/Mum/2008) has held that the manufacturing of a new product with a new technology at an existing place after taking a fresh approval from SEZ authorities does not amount to splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business for the purpose of section 10A of the Act. Therefore, the ld. AR prayed that the assessee deserve for exemption U/s 10A of the Act. 4. On the other hand, the ld Sr. DR has relied on the orders of the authorities below. He has further submitted that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ities below. 5. I have heard the rival contentions of both the parties, perused the material available on the record and also gone through the orders of the authorities below. I have also perused the paper book submitted by the assessee. The assessee was deriving income from export of jewellery and precious and semi precious stones so manufactured in his newly established manufacturing unit situated in SEZ, Jaipur. The assessee before the authorities below that this unit was not made out of any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

EZ, Sitapura, Jaipur to manufacture of Silver jewellery plain and studded, gold jewellery plain and studded, platinum jewellery, diamond, precious and semi precious stones etc. The necessary evidence is placed at page No. 78 to 79 of the paper book. As per the condition of the allotment of plot for establishing the industry at SEZ, Sitapura, Jaipur, the assessee to export the assessee s products and the unit is to be achieve positive net foreign exchange earner every year. This is evident from t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Radha Govind Jewellers, F-50, Radha Govind Complex, Maniram Ji Ki Kothi Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur dated 28/12/2009 is for purchase of rough tourmaline. At page 41 of the paper book, which is a bill of Siddharth International, 877, 111rd floor, White House, Ganga Mata Ki Gali, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Jaipur for purchase of silver casting mounting dated 09/12/2009. At page 42 of the paper book, which is a purchase bill of Ganesh Impex 890, G-T, J.K. Enclave, Ganga Mata Ki Gali, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version